
TRAVEL NEWS FROM DOT
U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood Proposes Legislation to Improve Rail Transit Safety Oversight
U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood today called on Congress to pass the Obama Administration’s Public Transportation Safety Program Act of 2009, a new transit safety bill to ensure a high and standard level of safety across all rail transit systems. The measure would effectively eliminate the statutory prohibition against imposing such broad safety standards that has been in place since 1965.
Secretary LaHood made his remarks in testimony before the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee in Washington, D.C.
“The current system
for federal rail transit safety oversight is weak and inadequate and does not
guarantee a consistent level of safety for transit passengers,” said Secretary
LaHood. “While rail transit remains a safe way to travel, the Obama
Administration believes it is time to take serious steps to make it even safer
and ensure a standard level of safety across all systems.”
Asking the Committee to consider the bill “seriously and
promptly”, Secretary LaHood pledged to assist Congress in enacting a new
safety regime that will better protect daily riders as transit systems age and
available revenues remain tight. The proposed legislation would do three
things.
First, the bill would authorize the Secretary to establish and enforce minimum federal safety standards for rail transit systems – effectively breaking through the 1965 prohibition. The bill would also provide the Secretary the option to establish a safety program for public transportation bus systems. Secretary LaHood also announced the formation of a Transit Rail Advisory Committee on Safety (TRACS) that will help guide the Department’s rail transit safety regulations.
Second, the bill would authorize the Secretary to allow states to receive federal transit assistance to staff and train state oversight personnel to enforce new federal regulations. State programs would have to be well-staffed and adequately empowered by state governments to fully enforce federal regulations in order to be eligible for federal funds.
Third, the bill would require the state agencies conducting oversight to be fully financially independent from the transit systems they oversee. The Federal Transit Administration would enforce all federal regulations where states choose not to participate in the program or where the state program is found to lack the necessary enforcement tools.
“More than 14 million passengers use our rail transit systems every weekday. Yet the responsibility to guarantee their safety is currently left to a patchwork of 27 state agencies with inconsistent standards, inadequate powers and insufficient staffing. With one exception, these agencies average less than one full time employee” said FTA Administrator Peter Rogoff, who appeared with LaHood before the House panel. “Our proposed legislation will better ensure that the millions of passengers who use transit to get to work, school and home every day do so safely and without incident.”
Under the Administration’s proposal, FTA and state agencies participating in federal transit safety enforcement would be authorized to conduct inspections, investigations, audits, and examinations, as well as test public transportation systems’ equipment, facilities, rolling stock, operations, and persons engaged in the business of a public transportation system. They would also have the authority to issue reports and subpoenas, require the production of documents, take depositions, and prescribe recordkeeping and reporting requirements.
For a text of the bill, go to http://testimony.ost.dot.gov/final/default.htm
# # #
FACT SHEET
THE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SAFETY PROGRAM ACT OF 2009
What Does The Act Do?
The proposed legislation does three things:
First, the bill would authorize the Secretary to establish and enforce federal safety standards for rail transit systems that receive federal transit assistance – effectively eliminating the statutory prohibition against imposing broad safety standards that have been in place since 1965.
Second, the Secretary would allow states to be eligible for federal transit assistance to hire and train state oversight personnel to enforce new federal regulations. State programs must be well staffed and adequately empowered by state governments to fully enforce federal regulations in order to be eligible for federal funds.
Third, the program would require the state agencies conducting oversight to be fully financially independent from the transit systems they oversee. The Federal Transit Administration would enforce all federal regulations where states chose not to participate in the program or where the state program is found to lack the necessary enforcement tools.
Why Rail Transit Regulation?
The current system for federal rail transit safety oversight does not guarantee a consistent level of safety for transit passengers among all transit systems in all states.
More than 14 million passengers use rail transit systems every weekday. Yet, the responsibility for their safety is currently left to a patchwork of 27 state agencies with inconsistent standards, inadequate powers and insufficient staffing.
While rail transit remains a safe way to travel, the Obama Administration believes we must take serious steps now to make it even safer and ensure that it remains safe in the years to come.
Additional Details of “The Act”
Under the Administration’s proposal, the FTA and state agencies participating in federal transit safety enforcement will be authorized to conduct inspections, investigations, audits and examinations, as well as test public transportation systems’ equipment, facilities, rolling stock, operations, and persons engaged in the business of a public transportation system.
FTA will also have the authority to issue reports and subpoenas, require the production of documents, take depositions, and establish recordkeeping and reporting requirements.
The Secretary would establish a safety certification program under which a state that chooses to participate would be eligible for federal transit assistance to carry out a federally approved Public Transportation Safety program. Participating states would be required to demonstrate to the Secretary’s satisfaction that the state agency has
an adequate number of fully trained staff to enforce federal regulations;
been granted sufficient authority by their governor and state legislature to compel compliance by the transit systems they oversee; and
sufficient financial independence from any transit systems they oversee.
In all states where either the state agency has “opted out” of participation or where the Secretary has found the requesting state agency to be inadequate, the Secretary, acting through the FTA, would enforce all federal safety regulations.
States would not be preempted from establishing more stringent safety standards than the federal standards, if the standards meet certain criteria.
The bill also would allow the Secretary to establish a safety program for public transportation bus systems that receive federal transit assistance.
Secretary LaHood also announced the formation of a Transit Rail Advisory Committee on Safety (TRACS) that will help guide the Department’s rail transit safety regulations.
DOT Fines Spirit Airlines for Violations of Consumer Rules
The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) today assessed a civil penalty against Spirit Airlines for violating DOT consumer regulations. Spirit was assessed a civil penalty of $375,000 for failing to comply with rules governing denied boarding compensation, fare advertising, baggage liability and other consumer protection requirements. The civil penalty to be paid is a record for these kinds of violations.
“Protecting airline consumers against unfair and deceptive practices is an important part of the Department’s mission,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. “We will continue to take enforcement action when airlines violate our rules.”
The Department’s Aviation Enforcement Office found that Spirit bumped passengers from oversold flights but did not provide compensation or a written notice of their rights to compensation, as required by DOT rules. The investigation also revealed that Spirit failed to resolve baggage claims within a reasonable period, on one occasion taking 14 months to provide compensation. Spirit also was found to violate DOT rules by providing compensation for delayed baggage only for the outbound leg of round-trip flights and only for purchases made more than 24 hours after arrival. In addition, Spirit violated baggage liability laws governing international travel by refusing to accept responsibility for missing laptop computers and certain other items it accepted as baggage.
Spirit also violated DOT rules requiring airfare ads to state the full price to be paid by omitting carrier-imposed fees from the base fare. It also failed to make available on request a copy of the Department’s rule prohibiting discrimination against disabled passengers. The Aviation Enforcement Office also cited Spirit for referring to DOT and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations when responding to consumer complaints even though the complaints did not concern DOT or FAA rules. Spirit also violated DOT rules by failing to retain copies of consumer complaints and by failing to file required reports in a timely manner.
The Aviation Enforcement Office’s investigation of Spirit involved a review of complaints filed with the Department by consumers as well as inspections at airports and a review of records at Spirit headquarters. The Aviation Enforcement Office will conduct a follow-up investigation of Spirit during the coming year.
The consent order against Spirit is available on the Internet at www.regulations.gov, docket DOT-OST-2009-0001.
U.S. Transportation
Secretary Ray LaHood
Announces Agenda for Distracted Driving Summit
Leaders to Explore Solutions to Distracted Driving
WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood today announced the agenda for the Distracted Driving Summit on Tuesday, September 30 and Wednesday, October 1. Over 200 safety experts, researchers, elected officials and members of the public will gather in Washington, D.C. to share their experiences, provide feedback and develop recommendations for reducing the growing safety risk that distracted driving is imposing on our nation’s roads.
“We must act now to stop distracted driving from becoming a deadly epidemic on our nation's roadways,” said Secretary LaHood. “This Summit will give safety leaders from across the nation a forum to identify, target and tackle the fundamental elements of this problem.”
The Distracted Driving Summit will bring together respected leaders from around the country for interactive sessions on the extent and impact of the problem, current research, regulations, best practices and other key topics. The two day Summit will feature five panels – on data, research, technology, policy, and outreach – with a range of experts discussing each topic.
The Summit will begin with a context setting panel where participants will examine the scope of the issue and the various distractions that exist, followed by a panel that will review currently available research. Day one wraps up with an examination of distractions caused by technology and efforts made to assess and reduce negative effects caused by current and planned devices. Panelists will also consider technology that can prevent the consequences of driver distraction.
Day two features a review of legislative and regulatory approaches for dealing with distracted driving; evaluations of the impact of such measures; and enforcement issues. Members of Congress and their staff will also have the opportunity to contribute to the discussion. Day two concludes with a discussion with teens about their experiences with distracted driving followed by an examination of various public awareness initiatives and research regarding the effectiveness of these efforts.
To accommodate the strong response, the Summit will be available live by webcast and members of the public will be given the opportunity to submit questions online for each individual panel discussion. The complete agenda and additional information about the Summit can be found at http://www.rita.dot.gov/distracted_driving_summit/ .
# # #
Distracted Driving
Summit
September 30 – October 1, 2009
Renaissance Hotel, 999 9th Street NW, Washington, DC
Agenda Is Subject to Change
Wednesday, September 30
DOT Welcome and
Summit Opening
Peter Appel, Administrator
Research and Innovative Technology Administration
Opening Address
Ray LaHood, U.S. Secretary of Transportation
Panel: Driver Distractions and Inattention – Definitions and Data
A context-setting panel on the definition of distracted driving (what it is
and what it is not), data on the extent of the issue, the types of
distractions across surface modes of transportation.
Moderator: Victor Mendez, Administrator, Federal Highway Administration
Speaker: Dr.
John D. Lee, Professor, Department of Industrial and Systems
Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Speaker: Kristin Backstrom, Senior Manager, AAA
Foundation for Traffic
Safety
Speaker: John Inglish, General Manager, Utah
Transit Authority
Speaker: Bruce Magladry, Director, Office of
Highway Safety, National Transportation Safety Board
Panel: Research
Results - How Risky is Distracted Driving?
This panel session will review what various
research – experimental research, industry self reporting, collision studies,
and observational studies– tell us about the nature of the problem of
distracted driving.
Moderator:
Rose McMurray, Acting Deputy Administrator, Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Administration
Speaker: Dr. Ann Dellinger,
Lead, Motor Vehicle Injury Prevention Team,
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, National Center of
Injury Prevention and Control
Speaker: Dr. Tom Dingus, Director,
Virginia Tech Transportation Institute
Speaker: Dr. William Horrey, Chair,
Surface Transportation Technical Group, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
and Research Scientist, Center for Behavioral Sciences, Liberty Mutual
Research Institute for Safety
Speaker: Dr. Key Dismukes, Chief
Scientist, Human Systems Integration
Division, National Aeronautics and Space
Administration Ames
Research Center
Panel: Technology
and Distracted Driving
This panel will focus on distractions caused by technology and on efforts that
have been
made (or are needed) to assess and reduce the negative impact of distractions
caused by
current and planned devices. It will also consider technology that can
prevent the
consequences of distraction.
Moderator: Peter
Appel, Administrator, Research and Innovative Technology
Administration
Speaker: Dr. David Eby, Research Associate
Professor and Head, Social
and Behavioral Analysis, University of Michigan
Transportation
Research Institute
Speaker: Rob Strassburger, Vice President, Alliance
of Automobile
Manufacturers
Speaker: Steve Largent, President and Chief
Executive Officer,
International Association for Wireless Telecommunications
Industry
Speaker: Michael Petricone, Senior Vice President,
Government Affairs,
Consumer Electronics Association
Speaker: Rod MacKenzie, Chief Technology Officer
and Vice President of
Programs, Intelligent Transportation Society of
America
Thursday, October 1
Congressional
Presentation
Panel: Legislation, Regulation and Enforcement of Distracted Driving
This panel session will review legislative and regulatory approaches for
addressing
distracted driving; evaluations of the impact of such measures; enforcement
issues; and
public attitudes towards the issue.
Moderator:
Peter Rogoff, Administrator, Federal Transit Administration
Speaker: John D’Amico, Representative,
Illinois General Assembly
Speaker: Bruce Starr, Senator, Oregon
Senate and Executive Committee
Member of the National Conference of State
Legislatures
Speaker: Steve Farley, Representative,
Arizona House of Representatives
Speaker: Major David Salmon, Director,
Traffic Services Division, New York State Police
Speaker: Vernon Betkey, Chairman,
Governors Highway Safety
Association and Director of the Maryland
Highway Safety Office
Youth Program
Panel: Public
Awareness and Education
This panel will review initiatives to increase public awareness of safety
issues such as
distracted driving, and will review research regarding the effectiveness of
such efforts.
Moderator:
Ron Medford, Acting Deputy Administrator,
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Speaker: Sandy Spavone, Executive
Director, National Organization for
Youth Safety
Speaker: Chuck Hurley, Executive
Director and Chief Executive Officer,
Mothers Against Drunk Driving
Speaker: Ann Shoket, Editor-in-Chief,
Seventeen Magazine
Speaker: Janet Froetscher, President
and Chief Executive Officer, National
Safety Council
Speaker: Dr. Adrian Lund,
President, Insurance Institute for Highway
Safety
Secretary LaHood
Closing Remarks and Action Plan
U.S. Transportation
Secretary Ray LaHood Announces Agenda for Distracted Driving Summit
Leaders to Explore Solutions to Distracted
Driving
WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood today announced the agenda for the Distracted Driving Summit on Tuesday, September 30 and Wednesday, October 1. Over 200 safety experts, researchers, elected officials and members of the public will gather in Washington, D.C. to share their experiences, provide feedback and develop recommendations for reducing the growing safety risk that distracted driving is imposing on our nation’s roads.
“We must act now to stop distracted driving from becoming a deadly epidemic on our nation's roadways,” said Secretary LaHood. “This Summit will give safety leaders from across the nation a forum to identify, target and tackle the fundamental elements of this problem.”
The Distracted Driving Summit will bring together respected leaders from around the country for interactive sessions on the extent and impact of the problem, current research, regulations, best practices and other key topics. The two day Summit will feature five panels – on data, research, technology, policy, and outreach – with a range of experts discussing each topic.
The Summit will begin with a context setting panel where participants will examine the scope of the issue and the various distractions that exist, followed by a panel that will review currently available research. Day one wraps up with an examination of distractions caused by technology and efforts made to assess and reduce negative effects caused by current and planned devices. Panelists will also consider technology that can prevent the consequences of driver distraction.
Day two features a review of legislative and regulatory approaches for dealing with distracted driving; evaluations of the impact of such measures; and enforcement issues. Members of Congress and their staff will also have the opportunity to contribute to the discussion. Day two concludes with a discussion with teens about their experiences with distracted driving followed by an examination of various public awareness initiatives and research regarding the effectiveness of these efforts.
To accommodate the strong response, the Summit will be available live by webcast and members of the public will be given the opportunity to submit questions online for each individual panel discussion. The complete agenda and additional information about the Summit can be found at http://www.rita.dot.gov/distracted_driving_Summit/ .
# # #
DISTRACTED DRIVING SUMMIT
SEPTEMBER 30 – OCTOBER 1, 2009
RENAISSANCE HOTEL, 999 9TH STREET NW, WASHINGTON, DC
Agenda Is Subject to Change
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 30
DOT WELCOME AND SUMMIT OPENING
Peter Appel, Administrator
Research and Innovative Technology Administration
OPENING ADDRESS
Ray LaHood, U.S. Secretary of Transportation
PANEL: DRIVER DISTRACTIONS AND INATTENTION – DEFINITIONS AND DATA
A context-setting panel on the definition of distracted driving (what
it is and what it is not), data on the extent of the issue, the types of
distractions across surface modes of transportation.
Moderator: Victor Mendez, Administrator, Federal Highway Administration
Speaker:
Dr. John D. Lee, Professor, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering,
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Speaker: Kristin Backstrom, Senior Manager, AAA Foundation
for Traffic Safety
Speaker: John Inglish, General Manager, Utah Transit
Authority
Speaker: Bruce Magladry, Director, Office of Highway Safety,
National Transportation Safety Board
PANEL: RESEARCH
RESULTS - HOW RISKY IS DISTRACTED DRIVING?
This panel session will review what various
research – experimental research, industry self reporting, collision studies,
and observational studies– tell us about the nature of the problem of
distracted driving.
Moderator:
Rose McMurray, Acting Deputy Administrator, Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Administration
Speaker:
Dr. Ann Dellinger, Lead, Motor Vehicle Injury Prevention Team, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, National Center of Injury Prevention and
Control
Speaker: Dr. Tom Dingus, Director, Virginia Tech
Transportation Institute
Speaker: Dr. William Horrey, Chair, Surface Transportation
Technical Group, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society and Research Scientist,
Center for Behavioral Sciences, Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety
Speaker: Dr. Key Dismukes, Chief Scientist, Human Systems
Integration Division, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames
Research Center
PANEL: TECHNOLOGY AND DISTRACTED DRIVING
This panel will focus on distractions caused by technology and on efforts that
have been
made (or are needed) to assess and reduce the negative impact of distractions
caused by
current and planned devices. It will also consider technology that can
prevent the
consequences of distraction.
Moderator:
Peter Appel, Administrator, Research and Innovative Technology
Administration
Speaker:
Dr. David Eby, Research Associate Professor and Head, Social and Behavioral
Analysis, University of Michigan Transportation
Research Institute
Speaker: Rob Strassburger, Vice President, Alliance of
Automobile Manufacturers
Speaker: Steve Largent, President and Chief Executive
Officer, International Association for Wireless Telecommunications
Industry
Speaker: Michael Petricone, Senior Vice President, Government
Affairs, Consumer Electronics Association
Speaker: Rod MacKenzie, Chief Technology Officer and Vice
President of Programs, Intelligent Transportation Society of America
THURSDAY, OCTOBER 1
CONGRESSIONAL PRESENTATION
PANEL: LEGISLATION, REGULATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF DISTRACTED DRIVING
This panel session will review legislative and regulatory approaches
for addressing
distracted driving; evaluations of the impact of such measures; enforcement
issues; and
public attitudes towards the issue.
Moderator: Peter Rogoff, Administrator, Federal Transit Administration
Speaker:
John D’Amico, Representative, Illinois General Assembly
Speaker: Bruce Starr, Senator, Oregon Senate and Executive
Committee Member of the National Conference of State Legislatures
Speaker: Steve Farley, Representative, Arizona House of
Representatives
Speaker: Major David Salmon, Director, Traffic Services
Division, New York State Police
Speaker: Vernon Betkey, Chairman, Governors Highway Safety
Association and Director of the Maryland Highway Safety Office
YOUTH PROGRAM
PANEL: PUBLIC
AWARENESS AND EDUCATION
This panel will review initiatives to increase
public awareness of safety issues such as
distracted driving, and will review research regarding the effectiveness of
such efforts.
Moderator: Ron
Medford, Acting Deputy Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Speaker: Sandy Spavone, Executive Director, National
Organization for Youth Safety
Speaker: Chuck Hurley, Executive Director and Chief
Executive Officer, Mothers Against Drunk Driving
Speaker: Ann Shoket, Editor-in-Chief, Seventeen Magazine
Speaker: Janet Froetscher, President and Chief Executive
Officer, National Safety Council
Speaker: Dr. Adrian Lund, President, Insurance Institute for
Highway Safety
SECRETARY LAHOOD
CLOSING REMARKS AND ACTION PLAN
Airline On-Time Performance Improved in July
The nation’s largest airlines had a rate of on-time flights this past July that was higher than both the same month last year and the mark posted in June 2009, according to the Air Travel Consumer Report released today by the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT).
According to information filed with the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), a part of DOT’s Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA), the 19 carriers reporting on-time performance recorded an overall on-time arrival rate of 77.6 percent in July, better than both the 75.7 percent on-time rate of July 2008 and June 2009’s 76.1 percent.
The monthly report also includes data on lengthy tarmac delays, flight cancellations and the causes of flight delays by the reporting carriers, as well as reports of mishandled baggage filed with the carriers, and consumer service, disability and discrimination complaints received by DOT’s Aviation Consumer Protection Division. This report also includes reports of incidents involving pets traveling by air, as required to be filed by U.S. carriers.
Cancellations
The consumer report includes BTS
data on the number of domestic flights canceled by the reporting carriers. In
July, the carriers canceled 1.2 percent of their scheduled domestic flights,
lower than both the 1.7 percent cancellation rate of July 2008 and the 1.5
percent rate posted in June 2009.
Tarmac Delays
In July, the carriers filing on-time performance data reported that .028
percent of their scheduled flights had tarmac delays of three hours or more,
down from .0499 percent in June. There were 29 flights with tarmac delays of
four hours or more in July.
Causes of Flight Delays
In July, the carriers filing on-time performance data reported that 6.89 percent of their flights were delayed by aviation system delays, compared to 7.69 percent in June; 7.33 percent by late-arriving aircraft, compared to 7.54 percent in June; 5.93 percent by factors within the airline’s control, such as maintenance or crew problems, compared to 5.94 percent in June; 0.74 percent by extreme weather, compared to 0.83 percent in June; and 0.04 percent for security reasons, the same percentage as June. Weather is a factor in both the extreme-weather category and the aviation-system category. This includes delays due to the re-routing of flights by DOT’s Federal Aviation Administration in consultation with the carriers involved. Weather is also a factor in delays attributed to late-arriving aircraft, although airlines do not report specific causes in that category.
Data collected by BTS also shows the percentage of late flights delayed by weather, including those reported in either the category of extreme weather or included in National Aviation System delays. In July, 39.42 percent of late flights were delayed by weather, down 11.16 percent from July 2008, when 44.37 percent of late flights were delayed by weather, and down 9.34 percent from June when 43.48 percent of late flights were delayed by weather.
Detailed information on flight delays and their causes is available on the BTS site on the World Wide Web at http://www.bts.gov.
Mishandled Baggage
The U.S. carriers reporting flight delays and mishandled baggage data posted a mishandled baggage rate of 3.98 reports per 1,000 passengers in July, an improvement over both July 2008’s rate of 4.87 and June 2009’s 4.17 rate.
In July, carriers reported six incidents involving the loss, death or injury of pets while traveling by air, identical to the total reported in July 2008 and up from June 2009’s five reports. July’s incidents involved three deaths, two injuries and one lost pet.
Complaints About Airline Service
In July, the Department received 827 complaints about airline service from consumers, down 24.3 percent from the 1,093 complaints filed in July 2008 but up 10.7 percent from the 747 complaints received in June 2009.
Complaints About Treatment of Disabled Passengers
The report also contains a
tabulation of complaints filed with DOT in July against airlines regarding the
treatment of passengers with disabilities. The Department received a total of
53 disability-related complaints in July, lower than both the total of 65
complaints filed in July 2008 and the 54 received in June 2009.
Complaints About Discrimination
In July, the Department received 17 complaints alleging discrimination by
airlines due to factors other than disability – such as race, religion,
national origin or sex – up from both the total of nine recorded in July 2008
and 10 received in June 2009.
Consumers may file their complaints in writing with the Aviation Consumer
Protection Division, U.S. Department of Transportation, C-75, W96-432, 1200
New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, DC 20590; by voice mail at (202) 366-2220 or
by TTY at (202) 366-0511; or on the web at
http://airconsumer.dot.gov.
Consumers who want on-time performance data for specific flights should call their airline’s reservation number or their travel agent. This information is available on the computerized reservation systems used by these agents.
The Air Travel Consumer Report can be found on DOT’s World Wide Web site at http://airconsumer.dot.gov. It is available in “pdf” and Microsoft Word format.
AIR TRAVEL CONSUMER REPORT
July 2009
KEY ON-TIME
PERFORMANCE AND FLIGHT CANCELLATION STATISTICS
Based on Data Filed with the Bureau of Transportation Statistics
by the 19 Reporting Carriers
Overall
77.6 percent on-time arrivals
Highest On-Time Arrival Rates
Hawaiian Airlines – 93.6 percent
Alaska Airlines – 87.2 percent
SkyWest Airlines - 83.6 percent
Lowest On-Time Arrival Rates
Comair – 63.6 percent
Atlantic Southeast Airlines – 68.3 percent
AirTran Airways – 69.8 percent
Most Frequently Delayed Flights
1. Northwest Airlines flight
1266 from Boston to Tampa, FL – late 96.77 percent of the time
2. Northwest Airlines flight 1554 from West Palm Beach, FL to Boston – late
96.77 percent of the time
3. Pinnacle Airlines flight 896 from Knoxville, TN to Atlanta – late 93.10
percent of the time
4. Comair flight 6511 from Omaha, NE to Atlanta – late 89.47 percent of the
time
5. Pinnacle Airlines flight 2923 from Detroit to La Crosse, WI/Winona, MN –
late 85.71 percent of the time
Flights with Longest Tarmac Delays
Delta Air Lines flight 745 from New York JFK to Portland, OR, 7/26/09 – delayed on tarmac 392 minutes
Continental Airlines flight 432 from Houston to New York LaGuardia, 7/29/09 – delayed on tarmac 310 minutes
Continental Airlines flight 1176 from Chicago O’Hare to Newark, NJ, 7/29/09 – delayed on tarmac 299 minutes
US Airways flight 17 from New York JFK to Phoenix, 7/26/09 – delayed on tarmac 276 minutes
JetBlue Airways flight 34 from New York JFK to Rochester, NY, 7/26/09 – delayed on tarmac 268 minutes
Highest Rates of Canceled Flights
1. Comair – 5.4 percent
2. American Eagle Airlines – 2.2 percent
3. Atlantic Southeast Airlines – 2.0 percent
Lowest Rates of Canceled Flights
Hawaiian Airlines – 0.1 percent
Alaska Airlines – 0.4 percent
Continental Airlines – 0.4 percent
Cash for Clunkers Wraps up with Nearly 700,000 car sales and increased fuel efficiency, U.S. Transportation Secretary LaHood declares program “wildly successful”
The CARS program came to a close Tuesday night with nearly 700,000 clunkers taken off the roads, replaced by far more fuel efficient vehicles. Rebate applications worth $2.877 billion were submitted by the 8 p.m. deadline, under the $3 billion provided by Congress to run the program.
Cars made in America topped the most-purchased list, from the Ford Focus to the Toyota Corolla to the Honda Civic.
“American consumers and workers were the clear winners thanks to the cash for clunkers program,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. “Manufacturing plants have added shifts and recalled workers. Moribund showrooms were brought back to life and consumers bought fuel efficient cars that will save them money and improve the environment.”
“This is one of the best economic news stories we’ve seen and I’m proud we were able to give consumers a helping hand,” Secretary LaHood said.
According to a preliminary analysis by the White House Council of Economic Advisers, the CARS program will:
Boost economic growth in the
third quarter of 2009 by 0.3-0.4 percentage points at an annual rate thanks
to increased auto sales in July and August.
Will sustain the increase in GDP
in the fourth quarter because of increased auto production to replace
depleted inventories.
Will create or save 42,000 jobs in the second half of 2009. Those jobs are expected to remain well after the program’s close.
Ford and General Motors recently announced production increases for both the third and fourth quarters as a result of the demand generated by the program. Honda also said it will be increasing production at its U.S. plants in East Liberty and Marysville, Ohio and in Lincoln, Alabama.
In addition, the program provides good news for the environment. That’s because 84 percent of consumers traded in trucks and 59 percent purchased passenger cars. The average fuel economy of the vehicles traded in was 15.8 miles per gallon and the average fuel economy of vehicles purchased is 24.9 mpg. – a 58 percent improvement.
“This is a win for the economy, a win for the environment and a win for American consumers,” Secretary LaHood said.
With the end of transactions under the program, the Department of Transportation is augmenting a team that already includes more than 2,000 people processing dealer applications for rebates.
###
C.A.R.S.
Program Statistics
Wednesday, August 26th, 2009
Dealer Transactions
Number Submitted: 690,114
Dollar Value: $2,877.9M
Top 10 New Vehicles Purchased
Toyota Corolla
Honda Civic
Toyota Camry
Ford Focus FWD
Hyundai Elantra
Nissan Versa
Toyota Prius
Honda Accord
Honda Fit
Ford Escape FWD
New Vehicles Manufacturers
Toyota 19.4%
General Motors 17.6%
Ford 14.4%
Honda 13.0%
Nissan 8.7%
Hyundai 7.2%
Chrysler 6.6%
Kia 4.3%
Subaru 2.5%
Mazda 2.4%
Volkswagen 2.0%
Suzuki 0.6%
Mitsubishi 0.5%
MINI 0.4%
Smart 0.2%
Volvo 0.1%
All Other <0.1%
Top 10 Trade-in Vehicles
Ford Explorer 4WD
Ford F150 Pickup 2WD
Jeep Grand Cherokee 4WD
Ford Explorer 2WD
Dodge Caravan/Grand Caravan 2WD
Jeep Cherokee 4WD
Chevrolet Blazer 4WD
Chevrolet C1500 Pickup 2WD
Ford F150 Pickup 4WD
Ford Windstar FWD Van
Vehicles Purchased by Category
Passenger Cars: 404,046
Category 1 Truck: 231,651
Category 2 Truck: 46,836
Category 3 Truck: 2,408
Vehicle Trade-in by Category
Passenger Cars: 109,380
Category 1 Truck: 450,778
Category 2 Truck: 116,909
Category 3 Truck: 8,134
84% of trade-ins under the program are trucks, and 59% of new vehicles purchased are cars. The program worked far better than anyone anticipated at moving consumers out of old, dirty trucks and SUVs and into new more fuel-efficient cars.
Average Fuel Economy
New vehicles Mileage: 24.9 MPG
Trade-in Mileage: 15.8 MPG
Overall increase: 9.2 MPG, or a 58% improvement
Cars purchased under the
program are, on average, 19% above the average fuel economy of all new cars
currently available, and 59% above the average fuel economy of cars that were
traded in.
This means the program raised the average fuel economy of the fleet, while
getting the dirtiest and most polluting vehicles off the road.
Requested Voucher Dollar Amount by State:
|
ALABAMA |
$31,251,500 |
|
ALASKA |
$4,868,500 |
|
ARIZONA |
$39,542,500 |
|
ARKANSAS |
$23,402,500 |
|
CALIFORNIA |
$326,822,000 |
|
COLORADO |
$37,676,500 |
|
CONNECTICUT |
$40,114,000 |
|
DELAWARE |
$11,235,000 |
|
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA |
$67,500 |
|
FLORIDA |
$146,565,000 |
|
GEORGIA |
$70,496,000 |
|
GUAM |
$675,000 |
|
HAWAII |
$7,333,500 |
|
IDAHO |
$11,655,000 |
|
ILLINOIS |
$143,613,000 |
|
INDIANA |
$65,797,000 |
|
IOWA |
$37,728,000 |
|
KANSAS |
$31,496,500 |
|
KENTUCKY |
$40,246,500 |
|
LOUISIANA |
$33,376,500 |
|
MAINE |
$16,579,500 |
|
MARYLAND |
$74,903,000 |
|
MASSACHUSETTS |
$64,855,000 |
|
MICHIGAN |
$132,407,500 |
|
MINNESOTA |
$73,160,500 |
|
MISSISSIPPI |
$12,463,500 |
|
MISSOURI |
$61,271,500 |
|
MONTANA |
$6,461,000 |
|
NEBRASKA |
$21,784,500 |
|
NEVADA |
$14,582,000 |
|
NEW HAMPSHIRE |
$23,045,500 |
|
NEW JERSEY |
$103,375,500 |
|
NEW MEXICO |
$13,941,500 |
|
NEW YORK |
$156,292,000 |
|
NORTH CAROLINA |
$78,601,500 |
|
NORTH DAKOTA |
$8,938,000 |
|
OHIO |
$136,267,000 |
|
OKLAHOMA |
$37,422,000 |
|
OREGON |
$37,531,500 |
|
PENNSYLVANIA |
$138,651,500 |
|
PUERTO RICO |
$2,252,000 |
|
RHODE ISLAND |
$10,690,500 |
|
SOUTH CAROLINA |
$37,207,500 |
|
SOUTH DAKOTA |
$10,367,500 |
|
TENNESSEE |
$50,949,000 |
|
TEXAS |
$183,776,500 |
|
UTAH |
$24,102,500 |
|
VERMONT |
$9,879,000 |
|
VIRGIN ISLANDS |
$1,553,000 |
|
VIRGINIA |
$98,523,500 |
|
WASHINGTON |
$55,927,500 |
|
WEST VIRGINIA |
$13,477,000 |
|
WISCONSIN |
$70,165,000 |
|
WYOMING |
$2,513,000 |
DOT Fines Three Airlines for Violations of Consumer Rules
The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), in its continuing effort to protect airline consumers, today assessed civil penalties against Continental Airlines, Hawaiian Airlines and US Airways for violating DOT consumer regulations.
“At the Department of Transportation we take the rights of airline passengers seriously, and we will take enforcement action when airlines violate our consumer protection rules,” U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said.
The Department found that
Hawaiian and US Airways failed to disclose to consumers when flights sold by
the carriers were being operated under a code-sharing arrangement, under which
a carrier will sell tickets on flights that use its designator code but are
operated by a separate airline. DOT rules require airlines to disclose to
consumers, before they book a flight, if the flight is operated under a
code-sharing arrangement. The disclosure must include the corporate name of
the transporting carrier and any other name under which the flight is offered
to the public.
The Department’s Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings recently made
a number of telephone calls to both Hawaiian’s and US Airways’ reservations
lines to determine if the carriers’ employees were advising consumers of
code-sharing arrangements as required by the regulations. The Enforcement
Office found that both carriers’ reservations agents failed to disclose
code-sharing during a substantial number of those calls. Hawaiian was
assessed a civil penalty of $50,000, and US Airways was assessed a $70,000
penalty.
Continental was assessed a civil penalty of $75,000 for violating the Department’s requirement that airfare ads must state the full price to be paid by the consumer. The carrier for a time advertised fares on its website that did not contain a notice of additional taxes or government fees at the first point at which fares were displayed or provide a link that would take customers to a page that would contain the notice. The notice of taxes and fees was provided only on a subsequent page. In addition, Continental listed numerous fares that were advertised as being “each way” or “one-way” fares without clearly disclosing, as required by DOT, that the fares were available only for a round-trip purchase.
DOT Proposes Fine for Williams-Transco Following Rural Virginia Accident
The U.S. Department of
Transportation today announced it is issuing a probable violation and proposed
civil penalty notice to Williams Gas Pipeline – Transco for federal pipeline
safety regulation violations. The proposed $952,500 fine follows the
Department’s investigation into the pipeline company’s September 2008 failure
near Appomattox, VA.
“Today’s announcement underscores the Department’s commitment to
ensuring that the nation’s energy pipeline system delivers critically needed
energy supplies both safely and reliably,” said DOT’s Deputy Secretary John
Porcari.
The proposed fine and probable violation is a direct result of a
thorough investigation recently completed by the Department’s Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). During the investigation,
PHMSA investigators discovered possible failures by Williams-Transco to
address regulatory requirements for monitoring and preventing external
corrosion. Installing effective corrosion control methods has proved to be a
vital maintenance function necessary to help ensure pipeline integrity.
“It is important for pipeline operators to remain vigilant in their
operations to prevent ruptures from occurring, keeping our communities safe
and without the disruption of energy supplies,” Deputy Secretary Porcari
added. “The assessment of civil penalties is a key component of our oversight
mission.”
Immediately following the accident, PHMSA issued Williams-Transco a
Corrective Action Order imposing restrictions and corrective actions on the
failed pipeline segment, as well as on adjacent lines. The order required the
company to take to immediately eliminate safety risks to surrounding public
and environmental assets, including pressure reductions, internal and external
inspections, and necessary repairs. In addition addressing the immediate
failure location, the order also required the company to focus attention on
other segments of the pipeline to identify and address potential problem areas
that could eventually lead to future pipeline failures. PHMSA personnel have
continuously worked with Williams-Transco to ensure all necessary requirements
included in the order are completed.
On September 14, 2008, PHMSA inspectors responded to a Williams-Transco
natural gas pipeline rupture and subsequent fire in Appomattox County, VA,
resulting in five injuries, the evacuation of 23 families, and the destruction
of two homes. PHMSA and its state pipeline safety partners oversee about 9000
miles of Williams-Transco natural gas transmission pipelines and 3000 miles of
gathering lines in 15 states and the Gulf of Mexico.
PHMSA’s pipeline inspectors and its state partners are committed to
ensuring the safety of America’s pipeline transportation system and will
continue to carefully monitor Williams-Transco activities.
.S. Transportation Deputy
Secretary John D. Porcari Announces $32.5 Million for East Penn Manufacturing
DOE Recovery Act Funds Will Go to Support the Next Generation of U.S.
Batteries
And Electric Vehicles Manufacturing
WASHINGTON, D.C. – At an event in Lyon Station, Pennsylvania today U.S. Transportation Deputy Secretary John D. Porcari announced that East Penn Manufacturing Company, Inc. will receive a $32.5 million grant from the Department of Energy under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). Today’s announcement is part of a ground-breaking 2.4 billion-dollar effort to help U.S.-based manufacturers make and test thousands of plug-in hybrid and electric vehicles along with the batteries, chargers, and other components needed to operate them.
East Penn Manufacturing is a third-generation family business with over 63 years in battery manufacturing. It will use the funds to expand its production capacities to manufacture high volumes of next-generation lead acid batteries. These batteries will serve as critical components of Hybrid Electric Vehicles meeting customer commitments for over 4.2 million batteries between 2009 and 2012.
“These batteries will support cleaner, more efficient cars that will increase fuel economy to meet CAFE standards, reduce local air pollution and greenhouse gases, and achieve greater energy security,” said Deputy Secretary Porcari. “Without question, this is a transformational moment for the transportation industry.”
U.S. Representative Tim Holden said, “We are pleased to have this great investment from the DOE. East Penn manufacturing enjoys a wonderful reputation based on their quality product and the great craftsmanship of their employees.”
The announcement marks the single largest investment in advanced battery technology for hybrid and electric-drive vehicles ever made. This $2.4 billion investment, coupled with another $2.4 billion in cost share from the award winners, will create tens of thousands of manufacturing jobs in the battery and auto industries in the U.S.
“If we’re serious about tapping into clean, alternative sources of energy to power our cars, trucks, and other vehicles, then we’ve got to invest in the technology, the training, and the manufacturing base to make that happen,” added Porcari. “Working together, we’re going to set the pace for America’s economic recovery and our environmental future.”
Recovery Act Crosses 6,000th
Highway Project Mark
$44.5 Million Project Near Phoenix
Hailed as ‘Major Milestone’
WASHINGTON – The widening of congested U.S. 60 – or Grand Avenue – northwest of downtown Phoenix this week became the 6,000th highway project funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA).
“This marks a major milestone,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. “This important project will improve safety and reduce traffic in and around Phoenix. It will also, like the thousands that came before it, put people back to work.”
The $44.5 million project will widen the route between State Route 303 and 99th Avenue, which serves an estimated 45,000 vehicles daily, from four lanes to six. In addition, intersections and medians will be improved, and turn lanes will be built at the intersections. When completed, the project will greatly relieve one of Phoenix’s most congested corridors and help to reduce greenhouse gases in the area.
Unlike other areas of the Phoenix metropolitan area, which can accommodate high volumes of traffic with access to interstate highways, the area near Sun City, El Mirage, Peoria, and Surprise – a vital link between Phoenix and Las Vegas – has no major road other than Grand Avenue. As a result, the volume of daily commuters and commercial truck traffic contribute heavily to local congestion.
Of the nearly $27 billion available for highway projects through the Recovery Act, Arizona’s share is $520.9 million. To date, Arizona has funded 135 projects totaling $307.8 million. Nationwide, states have funded more than 2,400 projects for more than $17 billion.
The First U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue Economic Track Joint Fact Sheet
As special representatives of President Barack H. Obama and President Hu Jintao, U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and Chinese Vice Premier Wang Qishan concluded the first meeting of the Economic Track under the U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue in Washington today.
On the U.S. side, they were joined by the following Cabinet members and other senior officials:
On the Chinese side, they were joined by the following Ministers and other senior officials:
I. Sustainable and Balanced Economic Growth
The United States and China have responded to the global economic crisis with comprehensive stimulus measures that have played a critical role in boosting confidence and supporting global demand, and will respectively take measures to promote balanced and sustainable economic growth in our domestic economies both to ensure a strong recovery from the international financial crisis and to bring about more balanced and sustainable global economic growth after a global recovery is firmly established. To this end, both countries will enhance communication and the exchange of information regarding macro-economic policy, and will work together to pursue policies of adjusting domestic demand and relative prices to lead to more sustainable and balanced trade and growth. Both sides will also pursue forward-looking monetary policies with due regard for the ramifications of those policies for the international economy. In addition, they will encourage new approaches to infrastructure financing to assist with economic recovery.
The United States will take measures to increase national saving as a share of GDP. The U.S. household saving rate has already risen sharply as a result of the crisis, contributing to a significant decline in the U.S. current account deficit, and the United States will adopt policies that will continue to encourage household saving. The United States will also reform its health care system with the aim of controlling rising health care costs for businesses and government while assuring high-quality, affordable health care for all Americans, and is committed to reducing the federal budget deficit relative to GDP to a sustainable level by 2013.
China will continue to implement structural and macroeconomic policies to stimulate domestic demand and increase the contribution of consumption to GDP growth. China will further enhance access in its service market and expand areas and channels for non-government investment, with a view to expedite the development of its services industry and increase the share of services in GDP. China will also deepen social safety net reform, including strengthening its basic old-age insurance system and enterprise annuities.
II. Foundations for a Strong Financial System
We acknowledge the critical role that strong, vibrant financial markets operating under transparent and market-based rules play in supporting balanced and sustained growth globally. We pledge continued close communication and coordination to promote financial stability and will work together to expedite the financial sector reform, to improve financial regulation and supervision, and to promote greater financial market transparency, so as to make our financial sectors more robust.
The United States will pursue comprehensive reform of financial regulation and supervision to create a more stable financial system and to help prevent and contain potential future crises. Regulation and supervision will be strengthened to ensure that all financial firms that pose a significant risk to the financial system will be well regulated, major financial markets will be strong enough to withstand system-wide stress and the failure of large institutions, and the government has the tools it needs to respond rapidly and effectively when problems arise. The United States pledges to continue to have strong oversight of the Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs). Through Congressional action, the United States remains committed to ensuring that the GSEs are able to meet their financial obligations. The United States is committed to undertaking a process of exploring the future of the GSEs, including through seeking public input, and the United States government resolves to report to Congress and the public by S&ED II.
To deepen its financial system reform and promote more efficient financial intermediation in support of domestic demand, China will promote interest rate liberalization and consumer finance; accelerate the allocation of QFII quotas to $30 billion; continue to allow foreign-invested banks incorporated in China that meet relevant prudential requirements to enjoy the same rights as domestic banks with regard to underwriting bonds in the inter-bank market; gradually increase the number of qualified joint-venture securities companies that can participate in A-share brokerage, proprietary trading and investment advisory services subject to the condition of meeting relevant laws and regulations; support qualified overseas companies to list on Chinese stock exchanges through issuing shares or depository receipts and continuously support qualified Chinese companies to be listed abroad, including in the United States.
We recognize the importance of ensuring sound regulation in our own countries and globally. The United States and China are undertaking IMF Financial System Assessment Programs (FSAPs) and will complete them in a timely manner. Both countries will continue to promote convergence towards a single set of high quality global accounting standards and will continue discussions on financial reporting matters. The United States and China welcome continued dialogue between the bilateral competent authorities on the oversight of accounting firms providing audit services for public companies in the two countries based on mutual respect for sovereignty and laws. The United States and China will conduct technical exchanges on the development of private pensions, and will share experiences and strengthen cooperation with regard to improvement of insurance regulation.
III. Trade and Investment
The United States and China are among the beneficiaries of and participants in the global trading system. Both countries are committed to work for a more open global trade and investment system and jointly fight protectionism.
The United States and China agree to call upon all other WTO members to work together for an ambitious and balanced conclusion to the Doha Development Agenda in 2010, consistent with its mandate, building on the progress already made, including with regard to modalities. Both sides re-affirm that, at a time of economic uncertainty, the ongoing bilateral investment treaty (BIT) negotiations, could contribute to the implementation of G-20 Summit commitments to an open global economy.
To promote trade and investment, China will further decentralize approval authority and streamline approval procedures for foreign investment, including by increasing over time the threshold for central government review. China agrees to commit itself to the implementation of the Generally Accepted Principles and Practices governing Sovereign Wealth Funds.
In addition, the United States confirms that the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) process ensures the consistent and fair treatment of all foreign investment without prejudice to the place of origin. The U.S. reaffirms its commitment to the open and non-discriminatory principles for recipients of sovereign wealth fund investment as identified by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. The United States also recognizes the continued progress China has made in its market reforms and will earnestly consider China's concerns, and will consult through the JCCT in a cooperative manner to work toward China's Market Economy Status in an expeditious manner. The United States and China agree to accelerate the implementation of "Guidelines for China-U.S. High Technology and Strategic Trade Development" and expeditiously formulate the Action Plan on Expansion of China-U.S. High Technology and Strategic Trade Cooperation in Priority Sectors.
The United States and China recognize the importance of non-discriminatory government procurement policies. To that end, the U.S. and China agree to strengthen their cooperation in order to accelerate China's accession to the WTO Government Procurement Agreement (GPA). This will include China's submission, to the WTO Government Procurement Committee before the Committee's October 2009 meeting, of a report that sets out the improvements that China will make in its revised offer. Moreover, China commits to treat, under its Government Procurement Law, products produced in China by foreign invested enterprises the same as products produced in China by Chinese enterprises. The United States confirms that products produced in the United States by an enterprise established in the United States are treated under its procurement regulations as domestic products regardless of the ownership of the enterprise.
Both sides also recognize the importance of trade financing for accelerating sustainable economic growth and the Export-Import Banks of the two countries will continue cooperation in this area. The two countries will strengthen their cooperation on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism, including counterfeiting.
IV. International Economic/Financial Institutions
The United States and China are committed to working together constructively and cooperatively, in this economic dialogue and the G20 as well as other multilateral institutions and fora. Both sides will continue to take steps to fully implement the consensus reached in the previous two G20 summits and will work together in the G20 to ensure that the Pittsburgh Leaders summit will deliver concrete, positive results. The United States supports China's continuation and strengthening of its exchange with the Paris Club and the Global Forum on Taxation.
The international financial institutions (IFIs) play an important role in ensuring sustainable global growth. The United States and China agree that to strengthen the effectiveness and legitimacy of the IFIs we must enhance their governance and ensure it fully reflects changes in the world economy. In this regard, emerging and developing economies, including China, should have greater voice and representation.
The United States and China agree to work together to reform international financial institutions in order to ensure they are responsive to the needs of developing countries, and strengthen their capacity to prevent and respond to future crises, including through improving their governance structure, enhancing their financial capacity and strengthening policy surveillance in the IMF's areas of core competency.
The United States and China support maintaining the IMF's central role in promoting global financial stability and growth. As two of the world's major economies, the United States and China share an interest in the IMF undertaking strong, even-handed and independent multilateral and bilateral surveillance.
The multilateral development banks (MDBs) need to have the right tools in place to help their members, especially the poorest, successfully promote sustainable poverty reduction and economic growth. MDB support should be based on a country-driven approach and include both financial and technical assistance to help build capacity for the attainment of Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).
The United States and China welcome the conclusion to the first Strategic and Economic Dialogue, and note the success of the Economic Track under the Dialogue led by Secretary Geithner and Vice Premier Wang. Both countries will continue to work together to build a positive, cooperative and comprehensive relationship for the 21st Century.
Annex: Institutional Arrangements and Exchanges
The United States and China agree that, in order to jointly address the challenges posed by the international financial crisis, promote economic and financial stability in both countries, and advance the development of bilateral economic relations, it is necessary to institutionalize bilateral economic cooperation between relevant agencies of both countries to a greater extent.
Both sides encourage cooperation through other bilateral economic dialogue mechanisms, including holding the banking supervisors' conference on a regular basis, undertaking dialogue between and the U.S. Department of Labor and China's Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security under the framework of existing Letters of Understanding (LOUs), conducting regular exchanges in domestic health and medical system reforms on the basis of on-going multi-level and multi-stakeholder health care cooperation, strengthening cooperation in agriculture and related fields on the basis of the existing and proposed bilateral agreements, continuing to work on the Memorandum of Understanding on Collaboration in Integrative and Traditional Chinese Medicine (2008), and holding the third U.S.-China Investment Forum, the U.S.-China Communications and Information Policy Consultation, the Second Meeting of the U.S.-China. Transportation Forum and the Third U.S.-China Symposium on Postal Reform and Express Delivery Services at an appropriate time.
U.S. Transportation Secretary
LaHood to Announce TIGER Discretionary Grant Awards Early in Effort to
Accelerate Recovery Spending
Washington, D.C. – U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood today said he will
accelerate stimulus spending and announce $1.5 billion in TIGER Discretionary
Grants as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act one month early.
The TIGER (Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery)
Discretionary Grant program will award Recovery funds on a competitive basis
to projects that have a significant impact on the nation, a region or
metropolitan area and can create jobs and benefit economically distressed
areas.
“Our top priority with the Recovery Act is to get money out the door quickly
in order to put people to work and get the economy back on track,” said
Secretary LaHood.
As part of the ongoing effort to accelerate spending, Secretary LaHood created
a review team to expedite the application process for the $1.5 billion TIGER
Discretionary Grant program. That will enable the Department to announce the
grants in January 2010 – one full month ahead of the statutory deadline.
“By awarding these Recovery dollars ahead of schedule, we’ll be able to jump
start major-impact projects and boost local economies across America even more
quickly,” Secretary LaHood said.
The Recovery Act was designed to ramp up over time with peak activity taking
place in the second half of 2009 and first half of 2010. After laying the
groundwork in the first 100 days of the Recovery Act, President Obama and Vice
President Biden last month announced the Roadmap to Recovery, ten major
projects taking place nationwide this summer that are a first step in
achieving that accelerated pace. Since then, the Administration has continued
to pursue additional ways to speed implementation.
Further information on the $1.5 billion TIGER Discretionary Grant program can be found
here.# # #
The Obama Administration is committed to injecting American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) dollars into the economy as quickly as possible to help get the economy back on track. A group of senior officials from the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), known as the Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) team, is managing the Department’s Recovery program to make sure its money is rapidly made available and the spending is closely monitored and transparent to the public.
FHWA Administrator Reviews
Highway Trust Fund With State Officials
Potential Shortfall and
Management Strategies Discussed In Call
WASHINGTON – Federal Highway Administrator Victor Mendez told state highway officials today what to expect if the highway trust fund falls short in the coming weeks during a “no surprises” discussion.
“Unless we shore up the trust fund, we will have no other choice than to pay the states less frequently for road and bridge repairs,” Mendez said in a conference call with lead officials from 38 states and the District of Columbia. Mendez added that payments, currently made on a daily basis, could be made weekly or twice a month, depending upon the availability of funds.
The highway trust fund, which provides states about $40 billion each year for roads, bridges, and other infrastructure projects administered by the states, often fluctuates and is expected to drop by the end of August. A shortfall would not shut down the Federal-Aid Highway Program, nor would it prevent states from using federal dollars for highway projects. However, it would affect how quickly FHWA reimburses states.
Department of Transportation officials continue to work closely with Congress to prevent disruptions in payments to the states
Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood Kicks-Off CARS Program, Encourages Consumers to Buy More Fuel Efficient Cars and Trucks
U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood today kicked off a buyer incentive program designed to help consumers purchase new fuel efficient vehicles and boost the economy at the same time. The Car Allowance Rebate System (CARS), commonly referred to as Cash for Clunkers, is a new federal program that gives buyers up to $4,500 towards a new, more environmentally-friendly vehicle when they trade-in their old gas guzzling cars or trucks.
“With this program, we are giving the auto industry a shot in the arm and struggling consumers can get rid of their gas-guzzlers and buy a more reliable, fuel-efficient vehicle,” Secretary LaHood said. “This is good news for our economy, the environment and consumers’ pocketbooks.”
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) also released the final eligibility requirements to participate in the program. Under the CARS program, consumers receive a $3,500 or $4,500 discount from a car dealer when they trade in their old vehicle and purchase or lease a new, qualifying vehicle. In order to be eligible for the program, the trade-in passenger vehicle must: be manufactured less than 25 years before the date it is traded in; have a combined city/highway fuel economy of 18 miles per gallon or less; be in drivable condition; and be continuously insured and registered to the same owner for the full year before the trade-in. Transactions must be made between now and November 1, 2009 or until the money runs out.
The vehicle that is traded in will be scrapped. NHTSA estimates the program could take approximately 250,000 vehicles that are not fuel efficient off the road.
In the coming, days, NHTSA will launch an all-out effort to raise public awareness about this program. On Monday, July 27, NHTSA will hold a Webinar with dealers from across the country to explain the program and make sure the process is as user-friendly as possible. Dealers and interested participants are encouraged to visit the official website
www.cars.gov for more information. In addition, NHTSA has established a toll-free hotline that consumers can call to get information on the program# # #
Car Allowance Rebate System (CARS)
FACT SHEET
ABOUT CARS:
The Car Allowance Rebate System (CARS) is a $1 billion government program that helps consumers buy or lease a more environmentally-friendly vehicle from a participating dealer when they trade in a less fuel-efficient car or truck. The program is designed to energize the economy, boost auto sales and put safer, cleaner and more fuel-efficient vehicles on the nation’s roadways.
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:
On June 24, the President signed into law the Consumer Assistance to Recycle and Save Act of 2009. The Act established a temporary program under the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) called the Car Allowance Rebate System (CARS), referred to commonly as Cash for Clunkers.
Under the legislation, NHTSA had 30 days from the time the President signed the bill to fine-tune administrative aspects of the Car Allowance Rebate System (CARS) including dealer registration, vehicle eligibility requirements, payment transfers and anti-fraud and abuse protections. The agency met the statutory requirement and issued the implementation rule on July 24. The program ends on November 1, 2009.
ELIGIBILITY:
To be eligible for a trade-in rebate, cars and light trucks must be at least a 1984 model-year vehicle or newer. The vehicle must be drivable, insured and licensed for at least a year, and get 18 miles per gallon or less combined highway/city rating. Both domestic and imported vehicles are eligible for the program. The credit cannot be applied toward the purchase or lease of used vehicles. Requirements for work trucks are slightly different.
HOW IT WORKS:
Consumers bring their vehicles, title, proof of registration and proof of insurance to the dealership. The rebate amount, at the time of purchase, will depend on the improved mileage of the new vehicle.
For passenger cars, consumers will receive a $3500 rebate if the new vehicle gets at least 4 mpg higher than the trade-in. To receive $4500, the new vehicle needs to get al least 10 mpg higher than the trade-in.
For light trucks, the $3500 rebate would require at least 2 mpg higher than the trade-in. To receive the $4500 rebate, the new vehicle must be at least 4 mpg higher than the trade-in
The dealers are later reimbursed by NHTSA through an electronic funds transfer. The vehicles traded in under the CARS program will be scrapped. Dealers are required under law to use a NHTSA approved salvage facility for vehicle disposal. Vehicles are required to be shredded or crushed within 6 months. The entity crushing or shredding the vehicles can sell some parts of the vehicle prior to crushing or shredding it, but these parts cannot include the engine or the drive train (unless the drive train, the transmission, drive shaft, or rear end are sold as separate parts).
NHTSA estimates that the program could remove approximately 250,000 fuel-inefficient vehicles from U.S. roads. Visit
www.cars.gov the only official website for this program.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS:
What is the Car Allowance Rebate System?
The Car Allowance Rebate System is a new program from the government that will help you pay for a new, more fuel efficient car or truck from a participating dealer when you trade in a less fuel efficient car or truck.
Do I need to get a voucher or sign up for this program?
No. You do not need a voucher and you are not required to sign up or enroll in this program. Participating new car dealers will apply a credit, reducing the price you pay at the time of your purchase or lease, provided the vehicle you buy or lease and the vehicle you trade in meet the program requirements. The dealer will then obtain reimbursement from the government.
How do I know if a dealer is participating in the program?
The law requires dealers to be registered to participate in the program. We will be moving as quickly as possible to register interested dealers as soon as the registration process begins in the near future. As dealers are registered, we will list them on this website. Meanwhile, you may wish to contact dealers in your area to ask whether they plan to participate in the program. The CARS Act requires that dealers be licensed by their respective state for the sale of new automobiles in order for them to participate in the program.
How do I know if my car or truck is an eligible trade-in vehicle?
There are several requirements (but you also have to meet certain conditions for the car or truck you wish to buy). Your dealer can help you determine whether you have an eligible trade in vehicle.
Your trade-in vehicle must: have been manufactured less than 25 years before the date you trade it in; have a "new" combined city/highway fuel economy of 18 miles per gallon or less; be in drivable condition and be continuously insured and registered to the same owner for the full year preceding the trade-in. The trade-in vehicle must have been manufactured not earlier than 25 years before the date of trade in and, in the case of a category 3 vehicle, must also have been manufactured not later than model year 2001. Note that work trucks (i.e., very large pickup trucks and cargo vans) have different requirements
What will I need to bring to the dealer in order to participate in the program?
You should bring documentation establishing the identity of the person who currently owns the vehicle, preferably the title of the vehicle, and documentary proof that the vehicle “has been continuously insured consistent with the applicable State law and registered to the same owner for a period of not less than 1 year immediately prior to the trade-in.” The final rule will specify what types of documentation would be acceptable.
More Frequently Asked
FRA Issues NPRM on Technology to
Prevent Train Collisions
New Rules Support Use of Positive Train Control
Today Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood and Federal Railroad Administrator Joseph Szabo announced proposed rules designed to prevent train collisions through the use of Positive Train Control. The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) prescribes how railroads must use Positive Train Control systems to prevent train-to-train collisions.
PTC technology is capable of automatically controlling train speeds and movements should a locomotive engineer fail to take appropriate action. For example, such technology can force a train to stop before it passes a red signal, thereby averting a potential collision. Other benefits of PTC systems include prevention of over-speed derailments and misaligned switches, as well as unauthorized incursions by a train into work zones.
“These proposed rules give
railroads the framework to use this life-saving technology,” said LaHood. “We
believe this is an important step toward making freight, intercity and
commuter rail lines safer for the benefit of communities across the country.”
Under the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008, major freight railroads and
intercity and commuter rail operators must submit their plans for PTC to FRA
for approval by April, 16, 2010. PTC systems must be fully in place by the
end of 2015. The proposed rules will specify how the technically complex PTC
systems must function and indicate how FRA will assess a railroad’s PTC plan
before it can become operational.
“FRA is setting the bar high in terms of design, construction and oversight of PTC technologies among different railroads,” said FRA Administrator Joe Szabo. “FRA will continue to advocate for ways to strengthen safety standards in the railroad industry.”
The major freight railroads have
reached an agreement for the operation of PTC technology across different rail
systems, allowing for industry-wide use. In addition, FRA is coordinating
efforts with the Federal Communications Commission to make a sufficient amount
of radio frequency spectrum available, which is essential for PTC technology
to function properly. This development will allow PTC technology to send and
receive a constant stream of wireless signals regarding the location and speed
of passenger and freight trains moving along rail lines.
WASHINGTON - U.S. Secretary of
Transportation Ray LaHood announced today that the Federal Railroad
Administration has received 278 pre-applications for grant funding totaling
$102 billion. The money will come from the American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act (ARRA) for the High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail competitive grant
program.
“The response has been tremendous and shows that the country is
ready for high-speed rail,” Secretary LaHood said. “It’s time to look beyond
our highways and invest in public transportation services like rail, which
will enhance regional mobility and reduce our carbon footprint.”
Pre-applications by region:
South/Southeast
Midwest
West
Forty states and the District of Columbia filed pre-applications. While not all proposed projects can be funded, the Department will work with states and regions to identify priorities and prepare for ongoing high-speed passenger rail development.
Congress passed the Recovery Act, which included an $8 billion competitive grant program as a down payment to develop high-speed and intercity passenger rail networks. The President has proposed a continuing $1 billion annual investment to further this effort.
The Department of Transportation issued a strategic plan for high-speed rail in April 2009, followed by guidelines for states and groups of states to apply for the economic recovery money in June 2009. The Department expects to announce the first round of merit-based grants in the fall.
The final application deadline is August 24 for funding on individual projects and planning, and October 2 for corridor programs.
To learn more about President Obama’s vision for high-speed rail in America, go to:
http://www.fra.dot.gov/us/content/31
New Roadside Survey Shows Steady Decline in Alcohol Levels, while Driver Drug Use is Detected
A new roadside survey by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration confirms a continuing decline in the percentage of legally intoxicated drivers.
In 1973, 7.5 percent of drivers had a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of .08 or higher. In the latest survey, that figure had fallen to 2.2 percent. A BAC of .08 or higher is now above the legal limit in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
Previous roadside surveys conducted by NHTSA have measured only alcohol. But the 2007 survey used new screening techniques that detected other substances as well and in the future may help show the extent of drug impairment among drivers.
The survey found 16.3 percent of nighttime weekend drivers were drug positive. The survey focused on weekend nighttime drivers and found that the drugs used most commonly by drivers were: marijuana (8.6 percent); cocaine (3.9 percent); and over-the-counter and prescription drugs (3.9 percent).
Transportation Secretary Ray
LaHood said he is concerned about the prevalence of drivers who use drugs, and
we should continue to fight against all impaired drivers.
“I’m pleased to see that our battle against drunk driving is succeeding,” said
Secretary LaHood. “However, alcohol still kills 13,000 people a year on our
roads and we must continue to be vigilant in our efforts to prevent drunk
driving.”
“This troubling data shows us, for the first time, the scope of drugged driving in America, and reinforces the need to reduce drug abuse,” said Gil Kerlikowske, Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy. “Drugged driving, like drunk driving, is a matter of public safety and health. It puts us all at risk and must be prevented.”
NHTSA is conducting further research to assess how drug traces correspond to driver impairment since some drugs can remain in the body for days or even weeks. Should further research indicate that drugs pose the same type of traffic safety risk as alcohol, NHTSA is committed to applying lessons learned in fighting the drunk driving problem.
Among the findings of the latest roadside survey are these:
The percentage of male drivers with illegal BAC levels was 42 percent higher than the percentage of alcohol-impaired female drivers.
Drivers were more likely to be illegally drunk during late nighttime hours (1 a.m. to 3 a.m.) than during daytime or early evening hours.
Motorcycle riders were more than twice as likely as passenger vehicle drivers to be drunk (5.6 percent compared with 2.3 percent). Pickup truck drivers were the next most likely to have illegal BACs (3.3 percent).
The 2007 survey involved more than 300 roadside locations throughout the U.S. To view the Research Note, click here.
USDOT Approves $386 Million Loan to Build Triangle Expressway in North Carolina
WASHINGTON – North Carolina’s plans for congestion relief just received help from the U.S. Department of Transportation through its approval of a $386 million loan to build two brand new sections of the Triangle Expressway in the Raleigh-Durham area, U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood announced today.
“This project will go a long way toward serving the travel needs of commuters in key educational and employment centers in this important region.” said Secretary LaHood.
The loan will help finance the
construction of the Triangle Expressway, representing more than 18 miles of
roadway connecting the region’s key interstates and state routes. It consists
of the new Triangle Parkway extending 3.4 miles north from NC 540; the
existing North Wake Freeway extending NC 540 south for 2.8 miles; and the new
Western Wake Freeway continuing NC 540 south for an additional 12.6 miles.
The three sections will be contiguous and improve access to I-40 and downtown
Raleigh.
Interstate-40 is the only interstate in the region to access Research Triangle
Park, one of the largest science parks in North America and home to about 160
companies employing more than 40,000 high-tech workers. Duke University,
North Carolina State University and the University of North Carolina at Chapel
Hill are also located in the area.
The North Carolina Turnpike Authority (NCTA) will receive the loan under the Department's Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) loan program which makes possible the financing of highway projects with flexible repayment terms. NCTA will toll the new highway to pay back the loan and also is expected to sell more than $600 million in bonds to complete the project's total cost of more than $1.1 billion.
DOT Approves Star Alliance Plan to Add Continental, Establish Joint Venture
The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) today granted final approval for antitrust immunity to Continental Airlines for its participation in the Star Alliance, and approved a new joint venture among four of the alliance’s members. Antitrust immunity allows airlines to coordinate their services and act as a single carrier for international air services covered by the immunity.
“I believe that the
Department’s decision will benefit consumers, enhance competition, and
preserve jobs in the airline industry,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray
LaHood.
In the final order issued today, the Department granted immunity to new
alliance member Continental and allowed Air Canada, Deutsche Lufthansa
Airlines, United Air Lines, and Continental Airlines to place a portion of
their international air services within a new joint venture, to be called
Atlantic Plus-Plus. Under the venture, the carriers will jointly arrange
capacity, sales and marketing, as well as share revenues in international
markets.
The Department concluded that granting antitrust immunity to Continental to join the alliance and approving the joint venture was in the public interest because it would support increased levels of service in international markets served by the carriers, give consumers more travel options and shorter travel times, and reduce fares. The United States has open-skies aviation agreements with all of the home countries of the carriers involved in today’s decision. Open-skies agreements provide for international market access to all home-country airlines.
Following comments from the Department of Justice and other parties on DOT’s April 7 tentative decision, the Department placed new limitations on the immunity in several markets to preserve competition. These limitations, also called “carve outs,” affect four transatlantic markets, four markets between the United States and Canada, and all markets between the United States and Beijing, China. The Star carriers may continue to serve these routes, but they will not be covered by the grant of immunity at this time.
As a condition of obtaining antitrust immunity, the Department required the carriers to implement the new joint venture within 18 months. The carriers also must provide annual reports to the Department about the implementation of their alliance agreements. The Department stressed that the carriers would remain subject to antitrust laws with respect to domestic service.
The Department first granted immunity to Star Alliance partners in 1996, when it approved an alliance between United and Lufthansa. Other members of the alliance are Air Canada, Austrian Airlines, British Midland Airways, LOT Polish Airlines, Scandinavian Airlines System, Swiss International Air Lines, and TAP Air Portugal.
The final and tentative decisions, alliance application and public comments are available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov, docket number DOT-OST-2008-0234.
THe following is a letter U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood sent to the nation’s governors today:
President Obama, Vice President Biden, and I have been focused on expeditiously moving American Reinvestment and Recovery Act projects to help fuel economic recovery in the States. I want to take this opportunity to commend and thank you for all your hard work in meeting the many deadlines and requirements of the Recovery Act. I also want to congratulate your fellow governors, as every State met the June 29 “50-percent obligation” deadline for designated highway projects at least 10 days ahead of schedule.
Today, I write to ask you to redouble your efforts in implementing an important Recovery Act provision: ensuring that priority is being given to projects in economically distressed areas. As of June 24, 26 States have obligated 50 percent or more of their Recovery Act highway funds to economically distressed areas, and six States have obligated 90 percent or more to these areas. While the percent of the Nation’s population residing in economically distressed areas is 37.7 percent, nationally 51.5 percent of all Recovery Act funding has been obligated in economically distressed areas. These numbers clearly indicate that States are working diligently to comply with this provision of the law.
Given that the number and population of economically distressed areas vary across States and that other factors must be considered in selecting projects, we do not expect all States to achieve the same level of economically distressed areas project funding. Overall, we have found that States are in making their best efforts and using the latest available data to quickly invest Recovery Act funds and generate jobs. I appreciate your commitment to this critical issue, given the importance of bringing dollars and jobs to communities that have been hardest hit in this economy.
I am pleased to note that State and Federal transportation officials have cooperated effectively to ensure that Recovery Act projects fulfill both the letter and spirit of the law. As you know, this can be a challenge, particularly given the need to harmonize the various, and sometimes competing, goals of the law. In this regard, the Federal Highway Administration has worked in partnership with the States to provide the tools needed to appropriately balance the requirements of starting and completing projects quickly, maximizing job creation, addressing critical transportation needs and complying with all Federal regulations—and to ensure priority is being given to selecting projects in economically distressed areas.
While it is important to be proud of our achievements, we still have work to do—and we need your continued help to reach our goals. Because many of the project costs are coming in well under initial estimates, we have the opportunity to fund additional work. I urge you, wherever possible, to obligate the funds saved from low bids on your initial Recovery Act projects, for highway and transit projects in economically depressed areas.
We look forward to continuing our productive and successful collaboration with you. Please do not hesitate to contact me or my staff if you have questions or concerns.
Sincerely yours
Ray Lahood
U.S. Secretary of Transportation
DOT Fines United for Failure to Disclose Code-Sharing
The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) today assessed a civil penalty against United Airlines for failing to disclose to consumers when flights sold by the carrier were being operated under a code-sharing arrangement.
“When consumers buy an airline ticket, they have a right to know which airline will be operating their flight,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. “We will continue to ensure that carriers are complying with the code-sharing rules.”
United was ordered to cease and desist from further violations and assessed a civil penalty of $80,000.
Under code-sharing, a carrier will sell tickets on flights that use its designator code but are operated by a separate airline. DOT rules require airlines to disclose to consumers, before they book a flight, if the flight is operated under a code-sharing arrangement. The disclosure must include the corporate name of the transporting carrier and any other name under which the flight is offered to the public.
The Department’s Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings made a number of telephone calls to United’s reservations line this past January to determine if the carrier’s employees were advising consumers of code-sharing arrangements as required by the regulations. The Enforcement Office found that United’s reservations agents failed to disclose code-sharing during a substantial number of those calls.
The consent order is available on the Internet at www.regulations.gov, docket DOT-OST-2009-0001.
As the United States and Russia stick to their own commitments, Obama said,
they must also hold other nations accountable for meeting their obligations.
He warned that Iranian or North Korean nuclear capabilities could spark an
arms race in East Asia or the Middle East.
"I'm pleased that President Medvedev and I agreed upon a joint threat
assessment of the ballistic missile challenges of the 21st century, including
from Iran and North Korea," he said.
But Obama said nuclear nonproliferation is a concern for the international
community writ large – an issue that's not solved by singling out individual
nations.
"If we fail to stand together, then the [Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty] and
the [United Nations] Security Council will lose credibility, and international
law will give way to the law of the jungle," he said.
Acknowledging that U.S. plans to configure a missile defense in Europe has
been met with opposition in Russia, the president reiterated that the system
is designed to defend against an Iranian attack, not to weaken Moscow. He also
proposed working with Moscow on creating acceptable missile defense
architecture.
"I want us to work together on a missile defense architecture that makes us
all safer," he said. "But if the threat from Iran's nuclear and ballistic
missile programs is eliminated, the driving force for missile defense in
Europe will be eliminated. That is in our mutual interest."
Speaking about Afghanistan, Obama highlighted another pact signed yesterday –
one that permits the United States to transit troops and weapons across
Russian territory en route to Afghanistan. The agreement allows for 4,500
flights per year through Russian airspace, and saves the U.S. government $133
million annually in transportation costs while boosting logistical efficiency.
He underscored America's goal in the region: to disrupt, dismantle, and defeat
al-Qaida and its allies in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
"I'm pleased that Russia has agreed to allow the United States to supply our
coalition forces through your territory," Obama said. "Neither America nor
Russia has an interest in an Afghanistan or Pakistan governed by the Taliban.
"It is time to work together on behalf of a different future – a future in
which we leave behind the great game of the past and the conflict of the
present; a future in which all of us contribute to the security of Central
Asia," he said, alluding to the 19th and early 20th century geopolitical
competition for Central Asian dominance known as the "Great Game."
Addressing a controversial topic, Obama said state sovereignty must be a
cornerstone of international order – a reference to the five-day conflict last
August during which Russia invaded an enclave within the borders of the former
Soviet satellite of Georgia. The government in Tbilisi is seeking membership
to NATO, which would guarantee protection under Article 5 of the Washington
Treaty, which created the alliance. The article states that an attack against
one NATO member is an attack against all.
But Obama underscored that NATO, a political and military alliance that came
to rise during the Cold War, now seeks collaboration with Russia, not
confrontation.
"For any country to become a member of NATO, a majority of its people must
choose to, they must undertake reforms, and they must be able to contribute to
the alliance's mission," he said. "And let me be clear: NATO seeks
collaboration with Russia, not confrontation."
Vice President Biden
Applauds States for
All 55 U.S.
States and Territories Obligate Half of
ARRA Highways Funding Ten Days Ahead of Schedule
Washington, DC –Vice President Joe Biden and Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood today announced that transportation projects funded under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) are putting people to work and building a foundation for the country’s long-term economic strength.
To date, $19 billion has been obligated to fund over 5,300 approved for highway and other transportation projects nationwide. Of those, 1,900 projects are already underway.
As part of the Administration’s effort to infuse Recovery Act funds swiftly into the economy, states are required under the Recovery Act to obligate 50 percent of their highway funds by June 29, 2009. Working in coordination with the U.S. Department of Transportation, all 55 U.S. states and territories successfully beat this deadline at least 10 days ahead of schedule.
“Our number one priority with the Recovery Act is getting folks back to work – and there is no better way to do that in these early days than by putting shovels in the ground and jump-starting projects like these that create jobs and boost local communities,” said Vice President Biden. “By delivering on these projects ahead of schedule and under-budget, we have been able to do even more than we expected -- create more job opportunities more quickly, with more dollars left over to put toward more projects that put people back on the job.”
Across the country, transportation projects funded by the Recovery Act are coming in under budget and ahead of schedule. States are routinely receiving low bids for highway and airport construction projects that are 10 to 20 percent, and in some cases, 30 percent lower than expected. These lower than expected bids are allowing states to stretch taxpayer dollars, complete additional projects and create even more American jobs.
“Every state not only met the 120-day deadline, they beat it,” said Secretary LaHood. “This is a testament to the fact that we’re putting money out there quickly and helping to get the economy back on track.”
ARRA funding for highway projects may be used for restoration, repair, construction, and other activities under the Surface Transportation Program. Each proposed project must be approved by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Governors must certify that proposed projects meet certain conditions and that the state will use ARRA funds in addition to, not in replacement of, state funding of transportation projects.
Priority is given to projects that are projected to be completed within three years, are located in economically distressed areas, or will maximize job creation and economic benefits.
Highway Obligation Deadline Information
State:
Date 50% Met Funds Put to work
Alabama June 5,
2009 $205,178,421.34
Alaska June 12,
2009 $68,800,219
Arizona April 21,
2009 $260,320,032.35
Arkansas April 17,
2009 $136,928,664
California May 1,
2009 $1,182,215,372
Colorado May 7,
2009 $210,616,018
Connecticut April 22,
2009 $175,151,318
Delaware June 17,
2009 $44,038,350.71
District of Columbia April 22,
2009 $82,565,030.43
Florida May 6,
2009 $877,594,135
Georgia June 17,
2009 $377,480,128.33
Hawaii June 19,
2009 $46,222,408.61
Idaho April 24,
2009 $88,032,562
Illinois March 10,
2009 $598,015,458
Indiana April 27,
2009 $282,946,089.96
Iowa March 11,
2009 $223,871,877
Kansas April 22,
2009 $209,905,329.6
Kentucky May 21,
2009 $165,284,312
Louisiana May 18,
2009 $198,588,287.98
Maine March 6,
2009 $91,526,422
Maryland March 20,
2009 $192,409,233
Massachusetts June 12,
2009 $173,530,958
Michigan June 2,
2009 $318,097,511.02
Minnesota April 20,
2009 $199,833,222.34
Mississippi April 23,
2009 $214,782,700
Missouri May 20,
2009 $320,569,742.4
Montana June 12,
2009 $81,262,208
Nebraska April 17,
2009 $109,207,334
Nevada June 18,
2009 $71,288,539
New Hampshire March 18,
2009 $88,022,625.99
New Jersey March 31,
2009 $365,794,829
New Mexico May 11,
2009 $143,393,729.04
New York May 26,
2009 $491,431,091
North Carolina May 8,
2009 $314,285,061
North Dakota April 15,
2009 $74,971,253.31
Ohio June 18,
2009 $338,895,927.5
Oklahoma March 16,
2009 $307,198,208
Oregon April 21,
2009 $155,807,073.87
Pennsylvania May 20,
2009 $447,678,440
Rhode Island April 7,
2009 $91,142,181.43
South Carolina April 2,
2009 $168,895,623.07
South Dakota April 1,
2009 $77,283,524.03
Tennessee April 7,
2009 $366,081,694
Texas June 12,
2009 $960,719,966.53
Utah March 12,
2009 $145,571,644.97
Vermont May 6,
2009 $53,069,059.08
Virginia June 17,
2009 $285,186,164
Washington April 27,
2009 $250,653,384
West Virginia June 4,
2009 $115,969,114.19
Wisconsin April 20,
2009 $270,422,647.78
Wyoming April 24, 2009
$98,729,721
CARS Will Put Safer, Cleaner, More Fuel Efficient Vehicles on Road
U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said his department stands ready to implement a new buyer incentive program signed into law today by President Obama which will help consumers pay for new, more fuel efficient vehicles when they trade-in a less fuel efficient car or truck.
“At this important time for the industry, we will help to boost automobile and truck sales while putting vehicles on the road that are safer, pollute less and get more miles to the gallon,” said Secretary LaHood.
Under the Car Allowance Rebate System (CARS), buyers stand to receive up to $4,500 toward the purchase or lease of a new car or truck that meets the necessary criteria.
For passenger automobiles, the car to be traded must be drivable, have a fuel economy rating of 18 miles-per-gallon or less, and be registered and insured for the full year prior to the trade in. To get a rebate, the new car must be priced at $45,000 or less, and, to receive the maximum rebate of $4,500, the new car must have a fuel economy rating of at least 10 miles-per-gallon greater than the car to be traded. To receive an incentive of $3,500, the same car would be traded for one that gets at least four miles-per-gallon better gas mileage.
For most vans, SUVs and pickups, the vehicle to be traded must have a fuel economy of 18 miles-per-gallon or less. To receive an incentive of $3,500, the new vehicle must get at least two miles-per-gallon better mileage. To receive the $4,500 incentive, the same vehicle would need to be traded for one getting at least five miles-per-gallon better mileage.
The purchaser does not receive the money directly from DOT. Instead, the dealer reduces the purchase or lease price by the allowed amount, and the government reimburses the dealer for that amount.
The incentive program begins within 30 days of today’s bill signing by the President. The final day for an eligible purchase or lease is November 1, 2009, or when DOT exhausts the funds set aside for the program, whichever occurs first. The credit is not retroactive prior to the start of the program and cannot be applied toward the purchase of used vehicles.
To achieve the objective of removing older, less efficient vehicles from the roads, vehicles traded under this program will have to be permanently disabled and/or scrapped.
CARS will be implemented by the U.S. Department of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Feds Release $140
Million to 36 States
New Resources to Help Communities Meet Transportation Needs
WASHINGTON – Thirty-six states were awarded nearly $140 million in additional federal aid this week to assist 249 transportation improvement projects, said U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood.
The projects range from the
widening of U.S. 17 in Putnam County, Fla., to streetscape improvements in
Haverhill, Mass., to the replacement of US 159 Bridge at Rulo, Neb., near the
Kansas-Missouri state line.
“Given the demands on the nation’s transportation system, these grants will be
a vital help to communities across the country,” said Secretary LaHood.
Through the “Transportation, Community, and System Preservation” (TCSP) Program, states, local and Tribal governments may apply for federal funding to support methods of increasing transportation efficiency, roadway improvements and research.
In the years since the program’s
creation in 1998, nearly $800 million in TCSP grants have been awarded to
improve national transportation efficiency, reduce environmental impacts of
transportation and improve the cost-effectiveness of infrastructure
investment.
The TCSP Program is managed by the Federal Highway Administration, in
conjunction with the Federal Transit Administration, the Federal Rail
Administration and the Research and Innovative Technology Administration
within the U.S. Department of Transportation and the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency.
A list of this year’s grant recipients is available online at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/tcsp/projects.html.
tatement from U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood Concerning Passage of the Consumer Assistance to Recycle and Save Act
“Today’s vote by Congress to pass the Consumer Assistance to Recycle and Save Act is an important step forward for America. It provides incentives for consumers to buy new, more fuel-efficient cars and trucks, providing a boost to the auto industry and protecting jobs, while limiting fuel use and greenhouse gas emissions.”
U.S. Transportation Secretary LaHood Announces Guidelines for Receiving Economic Recovery Funds for High-Speed Rail
The Department of Transportation moved another step closer to realizing President Obama’s vision for high-speed rail in America today, publishing guidelines for states and regions to apply for federal funds as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.
“The time has finally come for the United States to get serious about building a national network of high-speed rail corridors we can all be proud of,” Secretary Ray LaHood said. “High-speed rail can reduce traffic congestion and link up with light rail, subways and buses to make travel more convenient and our communities more livable.”
The historic commitment to revitalizing the nation’s rail lines by creating high- speed corridors and improving existing service between cities includes an $8 billion competitive grant program and a continuing $1 billion annual investment proposed in the President’s budget.
“Rail travel will encourage economic growth and create new domestic manufacturing jobs, while reducing pressure on our highways and airways,” said Federal Railroad Administrator Joseph Szabo. “In addition to the economic advantages, trains are energy-efficient, capable of reducing billions of pounds of carbons each year from being released into our atmosphere and reducing our country’s reliance on oil.”
Officials from the USDOT and Federal Railroad Administration met with more than 1,000 people across the country to receive input in preparation for developing the program’s grant application guidelines. Vice President Biden and Secretary LaHood also heard from governors and state transportation chiefs at the White House on June 3 about how they hoped to boost their economies with improved passenger rail service.
The guidelines, which can be found at http://www.fra.dot.gov/us/content/2243, require rigorous financial and environmental planning to make sure projects are worthy of investment and likely to be successful. The program will offer grants for both planning and construction so that states can apply for funds no matter what stage of development their project is in.
The guidance states that proposals will be considered on the merits for their ability to make trips quicker and more convenient reduce congestion on highways and at airports and meet other environmental, energy and safety goals. And it allows the USDOT to actively promote standard specifications for rail cars and other equipment.
The Federal Railroad Administration will award the first round of grants by mid-September.
Airline On-Time Performance Improves in April
The nation’s largest airlines had a rate of on-time flights this past April that was higher than both the same month last year and the mark posted in March 2009, according to the Air Travel Consumer Report released today by the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT).
According to information filed with the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), a part of DOT’s Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA), the 19 carriers reporting on-time performance recorded an overall on-time arrival rate of 79.1 percent in April, better than both the 77.7 percent on-time rate of April 2008 and March 2009’s 78.4 percent.
The monthly report also includes data on lengthy tarmac delays, flight cancellations and the causes of flight delays by the reporting carriers, as well as reports of mishandled baggage filed with the carriers, and consumer service, disability and discrimination complaints received by DOT’s Aviation Consumer Protection Division. This report also includes reports of incidents involving pets traveling by air, as required to be filed by U.S. carriers.
Cancellations
The consumer report includes BTS data on the number of domestic flights
canceled by the reporting carriers. In April, the carriers canceled 1.5
percent of their scheduled domestic flights, a lower rate than both the 1.7
percent cancellation rate of April 2008 and the 2.1 percent rate posted in
March 2009.
Tarmac Delays
In April, the carriers filing on-time performance data reported that .0152
percent of their scheduled flights had tarmac delays of three hours or more,
down from .0158 percent in March. There were five flights with tarmac delays
of four hours or more in April.
Causes of Flight Delays
In April, the carriers filing on-time performance data reported that 7.40 percent of their flights were delayed by aviation system delays, compared to 7.29 percent in March; 6.19 percent by late-arriving aircraft, compared to 6.49 percent in March; 4.78 percent by factors within the airline’s control, such as maintenance or crew problems, compared to 4.84 percent in March; 0.69 percent by extreme weather, compared to 0.62 percent in March; and 0.03 percent for security reasons, compared to 0.04 percent in March. Weather is a factor in both the extreme-weather category and the aviation-system category. This includes delays due to the re-routing of flights by DOT’s Federal Aviation Administration in consultation with the carriers involved. Weather is also a factor in delays attributed to late-arriving aircraft, although airlines do not report specific causes in that category.
Data collected by BTS also shows the percentage of late flights delayed by weather, including those reported in either the category of extreme weather or included in National Aviation System delays. In April, 44.38 percent of late flights were delayed by weather, up 17.13 percent from April 2008, when 37.89 percent of late flights were delayed by weather, and down 2.42 percent from March when 45.48 percent of late flights were delayed by weather.
Detailed information on flight delays and their causes is available on the BTS site on the World Wide Web at http://www.bts.gov.
Mishandled Baggage
The U.S. carriers reporting flight delays and mishandled baggage data posted a mishandled baggage rate of 3.79 reports per 1,000 passengers in April, an improvement over both April 2008’s rate of 4.99 and March 2009’s 4.12 rate.
In April, carriers reported no incidents involving the loss, death or injury of pets while traveling by air, down from three incidents in April 2008 and two in March 2009.
Complaints About Airline Service
In April, the Department received 781 complaints about airline service from consumers, down 29.8 percent from the 1,112 complaints filed in April 2008 but 10.8 percent more than the total of 705 complaints received in March 2009.
Complaints About Treatment of Disabled Passengers
The report also contains a
tabulation of complaints filed with DOT in April against airlines regarding
the treatment of passengers with disabilities. The Department received a
total of 46 disability-related complaints in April, up from both the total of
35 complaints received in April 2008 and the 37 complaints received in March
2009.
Complaints About Discrimination
In April, the Department received 14 complaints alleging discrimination by
airlines due to factors other than disability – such as race, religion,
national origin or sex – up from both the total of eight discrimination
complaints filed in April 2008 and the total of six received in March 2009.
Consumers may file their complaints in writing with the Aviation Consumer
Protection Division, U.S. Department of Transportation, C-75, W96-432, 1200
New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, DC 20590; by voice mail at (202) 366-2220 or
by TTY at (202) 366-0511; or on the web at
http://airconsumer.dot.gov.
Consumers who want on-time performance data for specific flights should call their airline’s reservation number or their travel agent. This information is available on the computerized reservation systems used by these agents.
The Air Travel Consumer Report can be found on DOT’s World Wide Web site at http://airconsumer.dot.gov. It is available in “pdf” and Microsoft Word format.
AIR TRAVEL CONSUMER REPORT
April 2009
KEY ON-TIME
PERFORMANCE AND FLIGHT CANCELLATION STATISTICS
Based on Data Filed with the Bureau of Transportation Statistics
by the 19 Reporting Carriers
Overall
79.1 percent on-time arrivals
Highest On-Time Arrival Rates
Hawaiian Airlines – 91.1 percent
Pinnacle Airlines – 86.2 percent
3. SkyWest Airlines – 85.8 percent
Lowest On-Time Arrival Rates
Comair – 68.6 percent
Atlantic Southeast Airlines – 69.4 percent
Continental Airlines – 72.0 percent
Most Frequently Delayed Flights
1. Northwest Airlines flight 803
from Atlanta to Honolulu – late 96.55 percent of the time
2. Comair flight 6652 from Kansas City, MO to New York LaGuardia – late
96.15 percent of the time
3. Comair flight 6295 from Indianapolis to New York JFK – late 90.00 percent
of the time
3. Comair flight 6675 from New York JFK to Dallas/Fort Worth – late 90.00
percent of the time
3. Continental Airlines flight 1567 from Cleveland to Newark, NJ – late
90.00 percent of the time
3. SkyWest Airlines flight 2852 from Milwaukee to Newark, NJ – late 90.00
percent of the time
Flights with Longest Tarmac Delays
American Airlines flight 2306 from Vail/Eagle, CO to Dallas/Fort Worth, 4/3/09 – delayed on tarmac 290 minutes
United Airlines flight 406 from Denver to New York LaGuardia, 4/17/09 – delayed on tarmac 264 minutes
American Airlines flight 370 from Chicago O’Hare to New York LaGuardia, 4/20/09 – delayed on tarmac 249 minutes
JetBlue Airways flight 1103 from New York JFK to Raleigh/Durham, NC, 4/6/09 – delayed on tarmac 247 minutes
American Airlines flight 2396 from Vail/Eagle, CO to New York JFK, 4/3/09 – delayed on tarmac 240 minutes
Highest Rates of Canceled Flights
1. American Eagle Airlines – 3.3
percent
2. JetBlue Airways – 3.2 percent
3. Atlantic Southeast Airlines – 3.2 percent
Lowest Rates of Canceled Flights
Alaska Airlines – 0.4 percent
Hawaiian Airlines – 0.4 percent
Northwest Airlines – 0.5 percent
Deputy
Transportation Secretary John Porcari Breaks Ground on Project Funded by the
Recovery Act in Wisconsin
Racine County Project is Largest Recovery Project to Start in Wisconsin
Washington, DC – U.S. Deputy Secretary of Transportation John Porcari, along with Wisconsin Governor Jim Doyle, broke ground today on the County Trunk Highway G Interchange construction project in Racine County, Wisconsin. The project, which received $19.6 million in American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funds, is currently the largest ARRA-funded project in the state.
“This project is what the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act is all about,” said Deputy Secretary Porcari. “It’s about putting Americans back to work as soon as possible, on projects that make a real difference in the quality of life for the folks who live and work in the area. Working together, we’re going to keep the Wisconsin economy moving, bring relief to middle class families, and improve transportation for the nation.”
“One of the best ways we can position Wisconsin for long-term growth is by investing today in the infrastructure that makes our cities and towns prosperous tomorrow,” said Governor Doyle. “A quality transportation system serves as the foundation of our state’s economy. And good roads are an extremely valuable economic asset that can play a vital role in determining where a business will locate or expand.”
Brandon Nesler, site Foreman on the Highway G project, was laid off from his construction job last year after 16 years of service. After several months of unemployment, Mr. Nesler was hired by Relyco, Inc., to oversee grading work on the recovery project.
“Whenever the government spends money to create work for people that are willing to strap on boots, pack a lunch and go to work, it’s a good thing,” said Mr. Nesler. “We need it; the state needs it; and so do all these men and women.”
Statement of U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood on House Passage of FAA Authorization Bill
I congratulate the House for its quick action in approving a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) authorization bill, H.R. 915. Moving forward with reauthorization will support our important aviation programs, including aviation safety and NextGen, the FAA’s program to modernize our nation’s airspace. I urge the Senate to act quickly and look forward to working with Congress on legislation that will continue our progress in improving the safety and efficiency of the U.S. aviation system.
Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood Reminds Drivers and Bicyclists to Share the Road During Bicycle Safety Month
As more people take to the roads on their bikes, U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood asks both drivers and cyclists to help reduce the number of cyclist fatalities. In 2007, 698 cyclists were killed in America. Everyone needs to pay attention when using America’s roads, whether they’re walking, biking or driving, LaHood said.
More and more Americans are taking up cycling, including a dramatic increase in bicycling by baby boomers. Whether they’re riding for fun, exercise, or to save on gas, more baby boomers are riding bicycles, according to the latest National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) statistics. Unfortunately, this aging trend can also be found in NHTSA’s latest fatality statistics. For the tenth straight year, the average age of persons killed on bicycles has increased. Research shows that in 1997 the average age of a person killed in a bicycle crash was 31; in 2007 it increased to over 40.
"Our roads and communities must be built to allow people to get around safely outside of their cars, on bike or on foot,” Secretary LaHood said. “These statistics show that our transportation program needs to have a much greater focus on making our roadways safe for bicyclists."
Since 1992, the Department’s Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has provided more than $4.5 billion in federal aid for bicycle and pedestrian safety programs. The States have used Federal-aid funds to construct shared use paths for bicyclists and pedestrians, and to provide bicycle lanes and bicycle parking, and other highway safety features to reduce fatalities and to increase bicycle use. FHWA also actively promotes bicycle safety through Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center and the National Center for Safe Routes to School. These efforts balance FHWA’s commitment to easing traffic congestion with keeping roads safe for all users.
“The most important thing bicyclists and motorists need to remember is that they both share the road equally,” said NHTSA’s Acting Deputy Administrator Ron Medford.
Recent data shows that the 698 bicyclist deaths in 2007 accounted for two percent of all traffic fatalities with an additional 44,000 injured in traffic crashes.
To avoid the risk of becoming a fatality, motorists and cyclists are urged to take extra precaution when driving and riding.
Motorists should:
Recognize that bicyclists have a right to ride on the roadway;
Always stay alert;
Make a visual check for bicyclists by checking mirrors and blind spots before entering or leaving a lane of traffic.
Cyclists should:
Ride on the roadway or shared pathways, rather than on sidewalks;
Follow the same rules of the road as other roadway users, including riding in the same direction as traffic and following all the same traffic signs and signals;
Wear a bicycle helmet every time you ride;
Make yourself visible by wearing bright colors during the day, reflective gear (clothing, arm or leg bands, etc.) in low light conditions,- and use head and tail lights at night.
To review NHTSA’s latest bicyclist and other cyclist traffic safety facts, click here: http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/810986.PDF
Secretary LaHood: TIGER Discretionary Grants Will Target Major-Impact Transportation Projects, Job Creation
U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood today announced the availability of $1.5 billion in TIGER (Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery) Discretionary Grants for capital investment in surface transportation projects. Grants will be awarded on a competitive basis to projects that have a significant impact on the nation, a region or metropolitan area and can create jobs and benefit economically distressed areas.
“TIGER discretionary funding will open up the door to many new innovative and cutting-edge transportation projects,” said Secretary LaHood. “This is exciting news and I believe that these projects will promote greater mobility, a cleaner environment and more livable communities.”
The grants can range from $20 million up to $300 million to support high impact transportation projects. Secretary LaHood can waive the minimum grant requirement for beneficial projects in smaller cities, regions or states. The U.S. Department of Transportation will require rigorous economic justifications for projects over $100 million. To ensure responsible spending, the department will require all fund recipients to report on their activities on a routine basis.
The solicitation published in the Federal Register today provides clear criteria for the department to make merit-based decisions on the new discretionary program.
Primary selection criteria include contributing to the medium- to long-term economic competitiveness of the nation, improving the condition of existing transportation facilities and systems, improving the quality of living and working environments through livable communities, improving energy efficiency and reducing greenhouse gas emissions and improving the safety of U.S. transportation facilities.
The Department will also give priority to projects that are expected to quickly create and preserve jobs and stimulate rapid increases in economic activity, especially projects that will benefit economically distressed areas.
Applications for TIGER discretionary grants must be submitted by September 15, 2009, from state and local governments, including U.S. territories, tribal governments, transit agencies, port authorities and others. Comments on the criteria must be received by June 1, 2009. The Federal Register notice can be accessed by clicking here.
New Study: Higher
Seat Belt Use Could Save Many Lives
Research Kicks Off “Click It or Ticket” Nationwide
Enforcement Campaign Set To Run May 18-31
A U.S. Department of Transportation study released today estimates that 1,652 lives could be saved and 22,372 serious injuries avoided each year on America’s roadways if seat belt use rates rose to 90 percent in every state. The new research report, based on 2007 data, also estimates that seat belts saved a stunning 15,147 lives that year. The study’s findings were released today as the Department launched its “Click It or Ticket” nationwide enforcement campaign.
“Wearing a seat belt costs nothing
and yet it’s the single most effective traffic safety device ever invented,”
said Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. “We want to let the American people
know that by failing to wear your seat belt, you not only risk serious injury
or death, you also risk getting a ticket.”
The “Click It or Ticket”
campaign is set to run from May 18 to May 31. The mobilization, expected to
involve more than 10,000 police agencies, is supported by $8 million in
national advertising funded through Congress and coordinated by the National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). The ads, which will air in
English and Spanish, generate awareness of the increased enforcement efforts
and the increased chance of getting a ticket if you are not buckled up. Ads
will be aired on television, radio, and online.
The estimated national seat belt
use rate – which stood at 83 percent in 2008 - is based on NHTSA’s National
Occupant Protection Use Survey. One of five Americans still fails to buckle up
regularly.
Speaking before students at a news
conference at a suburban Virginia high school, Secretary LaHood underscored
the worrisome reality that seat belt use rates are relatively low among
teenagers. Of the 4,540 16-to-20 year old passenger vehicle occupants killed
in 2007, 2,502 were unbelted at the time of the crash. Teen belt use rates are
especially low at night. In 2007, nearly two-thirds (65 percent) of the 16
to-20 year olds killed in nighttime crashes were unbelted at the time.
“Young people often think they’re
invincible. Yet like everyone in a passenger vehicle, they’re tremendously
vulnerable in the event of a crash,” Secretary LaHood said.
To view the research report, click here: http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811140.PDF
U.S. Transportation Secretary
LaHood Honors Mariners Who Participated in Rescue of Passengers and Crew of
USAIR Flight 1549
(New York, NY) – U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood today
presented Merchant Marine Outstanding Achievement Medals to civilian mariners
who participated in the rescue of the passengers and crew of US Airways Flight
1549. The event was held at the Intrepid Sea, Air & Space Museum in New York
City, overlooking the site of the Flight 1549 crash landing on the Hudson
River.
“These extraordinary men and women woke up on a cold January morning,
expecting an ordinary day,” said Sec. LaHood. “Yet by the time they got to bed
that night, they were true heroes. Thanks to their bravery and skill, they
helped save more than a hundred lives.”
Within minutes of the crash of US Airways Flight 1549 last January,
civilian mariners on the Hudson River responded to the scene and began the
work of rescuing survivors from the downed aircraft. Many of the civilian
vessels also volunteered to ferry New York City first responders, fire and
police personnel to the crash site. Their actions helped save the lives of all
155 passengers and crew members aboard.
The Merchant Marine Medal
for Outstanding Achievement recognizes individuals who have made
extraordinarily valuable contributions to the merchant marine. In all, 72
civilian mariners who participated in the rescue of the passengers and crew
from Flight 1549 will receive medals.
On Wednesday, seven representatives from companies and private vessels
involved in the rescue effort joined Sec. LaHood and other officials on-stage
to receive medals in the official ceremony: Scott Keon, M/V Lt. Michael P.
Murphy; Captain Vincent Lombardi, New York Waterway; Captain Ed Werber, Circle
Line; Robert Giordano, New York Water Taxi; Greg Hanchrow, Staten Island
Ferry; Captain Kenneth Poesl, Ken’s Marine; and Glenn Miller, Miller’s Launch.
A full list of the 72 Merchant Marine Medal for Outstanding Achievement recipients is below.
Kareem Abraham, New York Water Taxi
Santo Agusta, Miller’s Launch
Michael Albury, Ken’s Marine
John Angelillo, Staten Island Ferry
Osman Berete, New York Waterway
Natale Binetti, New York Waterway
Steve Black, New York Waterway
Dave Carhart, New York Water Taxi
Justin Carter, New York Water Taxi
Pepe Carumba, New York Waterway
Britanny Catanzaro, New York Waterway
Edward Cieslak, Ken’s Marine
Adam Clark, Miller’s Launch
Danny Convery, New York Waterway
Daniel Correa, New York Water Taxi
Mark Davidoff, New York Water Taxi
Robert Dunn, New York Waterway
Rich Engel, New York Water Taxi
Gulio Farnese, New York Waterway
Tom Fitzgerald, Circle Line
Robert Ford, New York Waterway
Tom Fox, New York Water Taxi
Angel Freire, Circle Line
Andrew Galarza, New York Waterway
Robert Giordano, New York Water Taxi
Xavier Gonzalez, New York Waterway
Mohamed Gouda, New York Waterway
Martin Haines, New York Water Taxi
Greg Hanchrow, Staten Island Ferry
Harry Hawk, New York Water Taxi
Frank Illuzi, New York Waterway
Michael Jordan, New York Water Taxi
Scott Koen, M/V LT. Michael P. Murphy
Manny Liba, New York Waterway
Vincent Lombardi, New York Waterway
Chris Loughrey, Miller’s Launch
Vince Lucante, New York Waterway
Carl Lucas, New York Waterway
Ross McDonagh, New York Water Taxi
David Martin, New York Waterway
John Mason, Circle Line
Terrance Maxwell, New York Waterway
Luis Melendez, New York Water Taxi
Cosmo Mezzina, New York Waterway
Glenn Miller, Miller’s Launch
Eddie Pagan, New York Water Taxi
Gregorio Pages, New York Waterway
Tom Paladino, New York Water Taxi
Mike Pellisi, New York Water Taxi
Jason Peters, New York Waterway
Shelly Phillip, New York Water Taxi
Kenneth Poesl, Ken’s Marine
Hector Rabanes, New York Waterway
Richard Redmond, Circle Line
Wilfredo Rivera, New York Waterway
Juan Rosario, New York Waterway
Luis Salerno, New York Waterway
Roger Sander, Staten Island Ferry
Endy Santana, New York Water Taxi
Dale Shaw, New York Water Taxi
Quaseim Smith, New York Water Taxi
Ted Sondergaard, New York Water Taxi
Michael Starr, New York Waterway
Jose Torres, New York Waterway
Sven Van Vatavia, Miller’s Launch
John Veriffimo, New York Waterway
Matt Warta, New York Waterway
Ed Werber, Circle Line
John Winarski, New York Waterway
Pete Zdrakas, Circle Line
Vince Zeppie, New York Water Taxi
Gadi Zofi, Ken’s Marine
President’s Budget Recommends $1.83 Billion for Transit Construction, Including 10 New Projects Across the Nation
On Thursday, President Obama recommended to Congress $1.83 billion in funding for major transit projects that will create jobs and increase transportation options throughout the United States. More than $600 million of those funds are being recommended for new projects in areas as diverse as Northern New Jersey; Austin, Texas; and Roaring Fork Valley, Colo. A list of projects and their descriptions is available at: http://www.fta.dot.gov/publications/reports/reports_to_congress/publications_9672.html
“By reinvesting in our nation’s transit infrastructure, we are making our communities more livable, invigorating the local economy, and putting America back to work,” U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said.
The spending plan, included in
President Obama’s Budget submitted to
Congress yesterday, announces recommendations by the Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) to invest $604.3 million in 10 new or expanding transit
projects —
five
projects
under the
New
Starts Program, which provides
federal funding for major capital construction projects, and
five projects
under the
Small Starts Program, which
funds smaller transit projects.
The plan also continues funding for 29 projects already, or soon to be, under
construction that have received commitments for federal funding in previous
years. Also, in a separate announcement this week, LaHood made available an
additional $742.5 million in American Reinvestment and Recovery Act funds for
11
of these projects.
An additional 13 proposals were evaluated by the FTA, but are not yet advanced
enough to be considered for funding. FTA’s
Annual Report on Funding
Recommendations for New and Small Starts for Fiscal Year 2010
provides information and ratings for all projects in the New Starts and Small
Starts programs.
Statement of U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood on the Departure of Deputy Secretary Thomas J. Barrett
Tom Barrett leaves the Department of Transportation with my deepest gratitude for all the fine work he has done here. I was delighted that he agreed to remain in office during the transition between administrations, and his knowledge and wisdom have proved indispensable in helping us get a quick start on economic recovery and other urgent priorities.
In his earlier role as the
first administrator of DOT’s Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, Tom undertook the hard work of organizing a new federal agency
with a critical safety mission.
Tom’s work at the Department, following a 35-year Coast Guard career in
which he attained the position of Vice Commandant, adds up to a distinguished
career of service to the public – one filled with accomplishments of which he
can be proud.
I wish Tom all the best as he becomes Deputy Federal Coordinator at the Office of the Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Projects. He will be missed.
BTS Releases Fourth-Quarter 2008 Air Fare Data;
Average Fourth-Quarter Domestic Air Fares
Drop from Third Quarter
Top 100 Airports: Highest Fare in Cincinnati, Lowest Fare at Dallas Love
Average domestic air fares in the fourth quarter of 2008 of $347 were 3.7 percent lower than the all-time quarterly high set in the third quarter but were still the highest for any fourth quarter on record, the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), a part of the Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA), reported today.
A press release containing information about fourth-quarter average fares and the Air Travel Price Index, a quarterly measure of changes in airfares is available at www.dot.gov/affairs/briefing.htm. Additional information about air fares in the fourth quarter, including average fares for the top 100 airports, and about ATPI, including indexes for foreign-origin itineraries and the top 85 air travel markets based on originating passengers, can be found on the BTS website, http://www.bts.gov/xml/atpi/src/index.xml.
Multiple airport areas for which a single average fare calculation is available are: Boston, Chicago, Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston, Los Angeles, New York, San Francisco and Washington, DC.
Airports covered by average fare calculations are:
| Alabama. | Birmingham | ||
| Arizona | Phoenix, Tucson | ||
| Arkansas: | Little Rock | ||
| California: | Burbank, Fresno, Long Beach, Los Angeles Intl, Oakland, | ||
| Ontario/San Bernardino, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, San Jose, Santa Ana (Orange County) | |||
| Colorado | Colorado Springs, Denver | ||
| Connecticut | Hartford | ||
| District of Columbia | Dulles, Reagan National | ||
| Florida | Ft. Lauderdale, Ft. Myers, Jacksonville, Miami, Orlando, Pensacola, | ||
| Sarasota/Bradenton, Tampa, West Palm Beach | |||
| Georgia | Atlanta, Savannah | ||
| Idaho | Boise | ||
| Illinois | Chicago Midway, Chicago O'Hare | ||
| Indiana | Indianapolis | ||
| Iowa | Des Moines | ||
| Kansas | Wichita | ||
| Kentucky | Louisville | ||
| Louisiana | New Orleans | ||
| Maine | Portland | ||
| Maryland | Baltimore | ||
| Massachusetts | Boston | ||
| Michigan | Detroit, Grand Rapids, Flint | ||
| Minnesota | Minneapolis/St. Paul | ||
| Mississippi | Jackson/Vicksburg | ||
| Missouri | Kansas City, St. Louis | ||
| Nebraska | Omaha | ||
| Nevada | Las Vegas, Reno | ||
| New Hampshire | Manchester | ||
| New Jersey | Newark | ||
| New Mexico | Albuquerque | ||
| New York | Albany, Buffalo, Islip, New York JFK, New York LaGuardia, Newburgh, Rochester, Syracuse, White Plains | ||
| North Carolina | Charlotte, Greensboro, Raleigh/Durham | ||
| Ohio | Akron/Canton, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus, Dayton | ||
| Oklahoma | Oklahoma City, Tulsa | ||
| Oregon | Portland | ||
| Pennsylvania | Harrisburg, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh | ||
| Rhode Island | Providence | ||
| South Carolina | Charleston, Greenville/Spartanburg | ||
| Tennessee | Knoxville, Memphis, Nashville | ||
| Texas | Austin, Dallas Love, Dallas/Ft. Worth, El Paso, Houston Bush, Houston Hobby, Lubbock, San Antonio | ||
| Utah | Salt Lake City | ||
| Vermont | Burlington | ||
| Virginia | Norfolk, Richmond | ||
| Washington | Seattle, Spokane | ||
| Wisconsin | Madison, Milwaukee | ||
STATEMENT OF
KAREN VAN DYKE
ACTING DIRECTOR, POSITIONING, NAVIGATION, AND TIMING
RESEARCH AND INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY ADMINISTRATION
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BEFORE THE
NATIONAL SECURITY AND FOREIGN AFFAIRS SUBCOMMITTEE
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM
HEARING ON:
GPS: CAN WE AVOID A GAP IN SERVICE?
MAY 7, 2009
Chairman Tierney, Ranking Member Flake, and Members of the Subcommittee:
I am Karen Van Dyke, Acting Director for Positioning, Navigation and Timing in the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA). I appreciate the opportunity to appear before you today to discuss the criticality of the Global Positioning System to the civil user community.
GPS technology is increasingly woven into the fabric of American society, from cars and planes to cell phones and wristwatches. It improves productivity and efficiency in many areas of commerce. For example, today’s construction, farming, mining, shipping, surveying, and traffic management systems have become dependent on GPS. The technology enhances public safety by preventing transportation accidents and by reducing the response times of ambulances, firefighters, and other emergency services. It allows agriculture operations to continue through low visibility field conditions such as rain, dust, fog and darkness, and to apply chemicals precisely, reducing environmental impact while reducing production costs. GPS also furthers scientific aims such as weather forecasting, earthquake prediction, and environmental protection.
Furthermore, the precise GPS time signal, derived from atomic clocks, is embedded in critical economic activities such as synchronizing communication networks, managing power grids, and authenticating electronic transactions.
Importance of GPS to NextGen
Of particular interest to the Department of Transportation is the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) program. NextGen is a wide-ranging transformation of the national air transportation system to meet future demand and support the economic viability of the system while reducing delays, improving safety, and protecting the environment. NextGen will change the way the system operates – reducing congestion, noise, and emissions, expanding capacity and improving the passenger experience. NextGen is a highly complex, multilayered, evolutionary process of developing and implementing new technologies and procedures.
NextGen will reduce fuel burn and greenhouse gas emissions, allow more direct, time-based routings, enable safer operations, and reduce runway incursions. United Airlines already has pioneered the use of tailored arrivals based on GPS from Honolulu to San Francisco, with a fuel savings of 1,600 pounds per flight.
GPS is the foundation for NextGen navigation and surveillance. The continuity of funding and integrity of the planned launch schedule of the GPS constellation is vital to the nation moving ahead with NextGen.
Commitment to GPS
I would like to thank the Air Force for their dedicated service in providing extremely reliable operation of GPS since it achieved Initial Operating Capability in 1993. The United States clearly is the leader in space-based positioning, navigation, and timing and we must continue to maintain and improve GPS, its augmentations, and backup capabilities to meet growing national security, homeland security, economic security, civil, and scientific demands, and to maintain this U.S. technology leadership position.
Sustainability of the GPS constellation is critical to users worldwide. The Department of Transportation is committed to modernization of GPS and providing funding to ensure the development and modernization of the next generation of GPS to provide new civil capabilities. Fully funding the DOT portion of GPS modernization is critical to ensuring that the GPS III program remains on schedule to ensure future constellation sustainment.
The Department of Transportation is confident that the Department of Defense will continue to operate GPS at or above the minimum GPS Performance Standard commitment of 21 healthy satellites 98 percent of the time, equivalent to 24 healthy satellites 95 percent of the time and will find innovative methods to extend the life of the GPS satellites to prevent any gaps in availability. We recognize that GPS has exceeded performance commitments with 30 satellites currently operational, and that some users may have come to expect this level of service.
Mitigation of Disruption
The Department of Transportation is a provider, as well as a user, of GPS services, augmenting the GPS signal to improve accuracy and integrity. FAA provides the Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS), and RITA coordinates resources and plans for the inland component of the Nationwide Differential GPS System (NDGPS), operated and maintained by the U.S. Coast Guard. WAAS and NDGPS stations are a part of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)-managed national Continuously Operating Reference Stations or CORS network of over 1300 permanently operating GPS receivers maintained by over 200 federal, academic and private organizations. The U.S. Air Force, U.S. Coast Guard, and the Federal Aviation Administration have agreements to coordinate and provide notification of GPS performance and any disruptions of GPS service to the user community.
For aviation users relying on unaugmented GPS, when the constellation is at its minimum GPS Performance Standard commitment, outages will be experienced on a routine basis, which could result in complaints and economic impact. For users who equip with GPS augmented by WAAS, the impacts are reduced, supporting minimum availability requirements of 99% or more.
However, like any radionavigation system, GPS is vulnerable to interference that can be reduced, but not eliminated. In 2001, RITA’s Volpe National Transportation Systems Center issued the “Vulnerability Assessment of the Transportation Infrastructure Relying on the Global Positioning System”. The findings of this assessment indicated that there was awareness within the transportation community of risks associated with use of GPS as a primary means for position determination and precision timing. Due to the reliance of transportation on GPS signals, it is essential that threats be mitigated and alternative back-ups be available, and the system be hardened for critical applications. DOT has determined that sufficient alternative navigation aids currently exist in the event of a loss of GPS based services.
Potential back-up capabilities to GPS are being explored as part of a National Positioning, Navigation and Timing (PNT) Architecture study, initiated in 2006 at the request of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Networks and Information Integration and DOT’s Under Secretary of Transportation for Policy. The overarching goal of the architecture, with GPS as its cornerstone, is intended to overcome identified capability gaps, and achieve an evolutionary path to providing integrated space-based, terrestrial, and autonomous solutions in the 2025 time period that will ensure the continuity of government-provided PNT services.
In conclusion, I would like to thank the Committee for allowing me to discuss the civil user perspective of GPS. The Department of Transportation is committed to continue our strong working relationship with the Department of Defense to maintain our global leadership in space-based PNT.
I would be glad to answer any questions you may have.
STATEMENT OF
ROY KIENITZ
UNDER SECRETARY OF POLICY
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BEFORE THE
COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION
SUBCOMMITTEE ON SURFACE TRANSPORTATION AND MERCHANT
MARINE INFRASTRUCTURE, SAFETY, AND SECURITY
U.S. SENATE
HEARING ON
PIRACY ON THE HIGH SEAS:
Protecting our
Ships, Crews, and Passengers
May 5, 2009
Chairman Lautenberg, Ranking Member Thune, and Members of the Subcommittee:
I am pleased to have the opportunity to appear before you today to discuss the serious threat stemming from the ongoing piracy problem on the high seas.
Throughout 2008 and continuing into 2009, the global piracy situation has grown substantially worse – particularly in an ever-expanding area off the coast of Somalia, where more than 20,000 vessels transit the region each year. The impact of piracy has been very significant but the American public has only recently been made more aware of the situation with the attacks on two American flag vessels, the MAERSK ALABAMA and the LIBERTY SUN (both of which were carrying food aid for Somalia.)
Acts of piracy threaten freedom of navigation and the flow of commerce. Pirates frequently demand millions of dollars in ransom for the release of hostages, ships and cargoes. Press reports indicate that in 2008, pirates received an estimated $30 million dollars in ransoms for the release of pirated vessels. In 2008, 42 vessels were seized by pirates operating off the coast of Somalia. Globally, 889 mariners were held hostage by pirates (815 in Somalia) as part of ransom demands. The International Maritime Bureau (IMB) reports that in 2008, globally, 11 mariners were murdered by pirates and another 21 are missing and presumed dead. The IMB also reported that during the same period, off the Horn of Africa, four mariners were killed and 14 are missing and presumed dead.
The vessels most vulnerable to piracy attacks are those traveling slowly (with limited speed capabilities) and with low freeboard – that is to say, there is not much height between the water and the deck level. At any given time during the past nine months, more than a dozen vessels and their crews have been held hostage off the Somali coast. Currently, 18 commercial ships are being held for ransom by pirates in Somalia, along with more than 300 crewmembers. One reason for the success of piracy and ransom taking is that the government in Somalia is ineffective and this has enabled pirates to operate with virtual impunity.
The Gulf of Aden, which links the Mediterranean Sea and the Suez Canal with the Indian Ocean, is one of the busiest shipping choke points in the world. On average, 50 commercial vessels transit the Gulf daily. Many of these vessels are potential targets. More than 3.3 million barrels of oil pass through the Gulf of Aden every day, representing 4% of the world’s total daily production and 12% of all the oil transported by water daily around the world by sea. In addition, numerous other cargoes and container freight pass through the Gulf daily.
Approximately 80% of the vessels transiting the Gulf of Aden carry cargo destined to and from Europe, East Africa, South Asia, and the Far East. However, a significant portion of cargoes is also destined to or from the United States. In addition, U.S. citizens serve as crew or are passengers on vessels transiting the area.
On average, at least one U.S. commercial vessel transits the area each day. Many of these U.S.-flag vessels carry Department of Defense cargo bound for Operations Iraqi and Enduring Freedom. U.S.-flag vessels transiting the region also carry humanitarian cargoes generated by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) or international organizations to the Horn of Africa, including Djibouti and, Somalia and to other countries in East Africa or South Asia.
As mentioned, piracy off the Horn of Africa significantly increased through 2008 and into 2009, with more than 150 attacks and 55 successful piracies. The cost and disruption to the flow of commerce overall are significant. Press reports indicate that, in addition to merchant mariners killed or presumed dead, hundreds, including American mariners, have been traumatized by being attacked and held hostage, and even by the uncertainties generated by the growing instability of the region.
Ship owners and operators are also adversely affected by rising daily operating costs, due to increased insurance premiums and operational delays caused by longer transit times or diversions to avoid the area. In many cases, there are additional costs related to transiting or circumventing the higher risk area. This is particularly true where vessels are diverted around the Cape of Good Hope in an effort to avoid the Gulf of Aden altogether, which increases labor costs, fuel consumption and the carbon footprint of marine transportation. Higher shipping costs also raise the costs of commodities for local populations.
The United States has been a leader in promoting collaborative international action to combat the current piracy crisis. Historically, it has been our nation’s long-standing policy to support freedom of the seas. In July 2008, the United States took a leadership role in the United Nations fight against piracy. This resulted in United Nations (UN) Security Council Resolution 1816, which authorized countries cooperating with the Transitional Federal Government (TFG) of Somalia, for which advance notification has been provided to the Secretary-General, to enter Somali territorial waters to repress piracy. This was followed by additional Security Council Resolutions 1838 and 1846 in the fall of 2008. In December 2008, the United States drafted UN Security Council Resolution 1851, which authorizes countries cooperating with the TFG of Somalia to enter Somali territory to repress piracy. The Security Council subsequently, adopted this resolution.
UN Security Council Resolution 1851, also encouraged the establishment of an international cooperation mechanism -- known now as the Contact Group on Piracy off the Coast of Somalia (CGPCS). The CGPCS has 28 nations as members, 6 international organization observers, with 7 additional countries pending requests to participate.[1] The Department of State leads the United States participation in the CGPCS. The CGPCS acts as a common point of contact between and among states, regional and international organizations on all aspects of combating piracy and armed robbery at sea off Somalia’s coast, and specifically includes outreach to the commercial maritime industry. The CGPCS held plenary meetings in January at the United Nations in New York City and in Cairo in mid-March. The CGPCS will meet again on May 29 in New York City.
The CGPCS established four working groups that are providing recommendations to the CGPCS. Working Group #1 is addressing activities related to military and operational coordination and is chaired by the United Kingdom. Working Group #2 is addressing judicial aspects of piracy and is chaired by Denmark. The United States has the lead for Working Group #3, which focuses on shipping self-awareness and interaction with industry. The Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration (MARAD) and the Department of Homeland Security’s U.S. Coast Guard have been co-leading efforts with this Working Group. Working Group #4 is tasked to offer recommendations to improve diplomatic and public information efforts and is chaired by Egypt. The U.S. will propose on May 29 the creation of Working Group #5 to explore the feasibility of tracking and freezing the assets of pirates and those who support them.
The UN Security Council resolutions called for greater cooperation between governments and industry to reduce the incidence of piracy. In January 2009, former Secretary of State Rice stated that, "Once a hostage situation develops, the stakes in military operations increase. Consequently, an important part of counter-piracy efforts must be measured in enhancing self-defense capabilities of commercial vessels, increasing the odds of success against pirates until warships arrive." This sentiment certainly still holds true today and we saw evidence of this in the highjacking of the MAERSK ALABAMA.
Because of its specialized knowledge, such as operation of our mobility sealift vessels, and established relationships with U.S. and international shipping, maritime unions, the marine insurance community and global maritime industry associations, MARAD has considerable experience in dealing with the diverse interests of the global maritime industry and is actively involved in the fight against piracy. MARAD operates a fleet of Ready Reserve Force (RRF) vessels which have transited the Gulf of Aden region in support of Operations Iraqi and Enduring Freedom (OIF/OEF). As OIF winds down, RRF vessels may be called upon to play a significant role again in support of the demobilization of forces, with a consequence of exposing the vessels and crews to threats from pirate attacks.
Further, many vessels supported by MARAD’s Maritime Security Program (MSP), participate in the Agency’s Voluntary Intermodal Sealift Agreement (VISA) and transit the Gulf of Aden on a routine basis. The MAERSK ALABAMA is one of the 60 vessels enrolled in the MSP. MARAD also has oversight over government cargoes transiting the region – particularly food aid and military cargoes that are carried mainly aboard U.S.-flag commercial vessels transiting the Gulf. Finally, as an interface between U.S. maritime labor and the federal government, MARAD also has great interest in protecting the welfare of U.S. mariners who sail aboard vessels in the region.
MARAD provides operational advice to U.S.-flag owners and operators, including counter-piracy measures and awareness, on a regular basis through MARAD Advisories, through a comprehensive and frequently updated website, and through MARAD’s electronic “MARVIEW” system which is available to registered users. We also play a key role in the training of merchant mariners through the development of International Maritime Organization (IMO) maritime security courses and workforce development. Working with the Coast Guard and IMO, Vessel Security Officer, Company Security Officer, and Facility Security Officer, courses were developed by the United States Merchant Marine Academy (USMMA). MARAD continues to certify maritime security training providers who meet the criteria established by the Coast Guard. To date, more than 50 training providers have been certified across the country. Efforts are also being made to include anti-piracy and security training in the academic programs at USMMA and the state maritime schools.
In late December 2008, the Department of State asked MARAD to assist with the CGPCS Industry Outreach Working Group. To this end, MARAD has met on numerous occasions with industry to help shape best management practices to counter piracy and to share industry concerns with U.S. government agencies. In late December, the National Security Council published an action plan entitled, “Countering Piracy off the Horn of Africa: Partnership & Action Plan” (CPAP). MARAD was actively involved in developing this plan, and posted the CPAP on its website for the benefit of industry.
MARAD strongly supported the Military Sealift Command’s proposal to create and implement “Anti-Piracy Assessment Teams” for commercial vessels. These teams consist of personnel from the Naval Criminal Investigative Service, and MARAD. On a voluntary basis, these teams board U.S.-flag vessels and offer recommendations on how to improve a vessel’s physical defenses against piracy, and review security tactics, techniques and procedures. To date, a number of successful Anti-Piracy Assessment Team vessel assessments and recommendations have been completed. We expect this process to be embraced by the international community for similar implementation.
MARAD’s continuing outreach to the maritime industry on the piracy issue has taken many forms. In addition to leading informal meetings and participating in international forums, MARAD has hosted several collaborative meetings with both the American and international maritime industry community and appropriate federal agencies. For example, in October and November 2008, MARAD and the Department of State sponsored meetings with representatives from the maritime industry to specifically discuss piracy in the Gulf of Aden. Participants included company security officers from major U.S. flag carriers, including American President Lines (APL), Horizon Lines, Maersk, Intermarine, Interamerican Ocean Shipping, American Roll On/Roll Off, Crowley, American Overseas Marine, and Ocean Shipholdings. Flag states with U.S.-owned vessels or with vessels serving strategic U.S. interests also participated, including representatives from Denmark, Marshall Islands, Liberia and Panama. The U.S. Navy’s Maritime Liaison Office Bahrain and the United Kingdom’s Maritime Transport Office were also included. Topics specifically addressed at these meetings were maneuvering and speed, illumination, communication, duress terminology, armed force protection, and self-defense devices which may be used to deter piracy.
At the request of the maritime industry, MARAD facilitated extensive discussions on piracy with the Department of State, Department of Defense, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the Department of Homeland Security’s Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and Coast Guard. In November 2008, MARAD participated in a public hearing hosted by the Coast Guard, focused on piracy initiatives being considered by the International Maritime Organization’s Maritime Safety Committee (MSC). In December 2008, MARAD staff played an instrumental role in several other international planning events related to piracy. MARAD participated in the NATO Senior Civil Emergency Planning Committee (SCEPC) meeting held in Brussels, Belgium, which included piracy as an agenda item. MARAD chairs the NATO Planning Board on Ocean Shipping, which reports to the SCEPC.
On December 2, 2008, MARAD hosted a Piracy Round Table meeting to discuss industry “self-help” and best practices to counter piracy. This meeting brought U.S. government agencies together with the maritime industry to develop a mutual understanding of the problem and to develop best practices recommendations. Members of the industry included shipping associations, registries, carriers, marine insurance companies and representatives from the European Union. U.S. government representatives included personnel from the Coast Guard, Department of State, Department of Defense, Office of Naval Intelligence, USAID, the National Security Council, and the Homeland Security Council. MARAD established an Anti-Piracy portal on the Agency’s website, which is continuously updated. MARAD Advisories are posted on this site as are any recent developments and key contact information.
MARAD hosted an international maritime industry Piracy Summit on December 11, 2008, with representatives from more than 50 industry associations, insurers, shipping companies, and labor to encourage them to further develop best management practices to combat piracy and to implement these strategies. Representatives from government included the Department of State, the Coast Guard, U.S. Transportation Command, Office of Naval Intelligence and Military Sealift Command.
In late December, MARAD joined the Department of State for discussions in London between representatives of European Union navies and maritime trade associations. The purpose of these discussions was to further develop and implement best management practices and to improve communication between maritime companies and military forces in the Gulf of Aden region. MARAD continues to meet with industry to finalize best management practices and share industry concerns with government agencies.
In early 2009, MARAD intensified its efforts in the fight against piracy to further improve coordination between industry and the various navies participating in the Gulf of Aden, to provide voluntary assessments of security on U.S. vessels, and to further establish best management practices to prevent piracy and to bring industry’s perspectives and ideas to the interagency. Additional industry meetings, UN meetings, meetings hosted by the Baltic International Maritime Council (BIMCO) and a counter-piracy meeting held in Dubai and hosted by the Maritime Liaison Office in Bahrain, have all pursued these objectives. Since maritime labor is uniquely vulnerable to pirate attacks, with mariners having been killed or held hostage as part of ransom demands, MARAD has included maritime labor in many of the discussions and meetings.
The Maritime Administration led the U.S. delegation of Working Group #3 at the meeting of the Contact Group on Piracy off the Coast of Somalia in March of 2009 and presented the international industry developed (and MARAD facilitated) “Best Management Practices” (BMPs) to counter piracy. MARAD also supported the dissemination of counter piracy guidance and supported better coordination between military and civilian operators in the region.
MARAD has further developed its electronic information system “MARVIEW” and contributed to the Maritime Safety and Security Information System (MSSIS) for the purposes of providing more efficient piracy related data. MARAD is providing U.S. flag projected schedules in the waters off Somalia to the National Maritime Intelligence Center (NMIC) and vessel tracking information on U.S. flag carriers to appropriate military authorities.
Given limited military resources available to fully protect commercial shipping in the waters off Somalia, there is an increasing focus on the issue of shipping companies hiring private armed security personnel to protect their vessels while transiting the waters off Somalia. There are many complicated factors which must be addressed before the industry, as a whole, can adopt this recommendation. These include the need to develop appropriate standards for armed security providers, compliance with port state restrictions on arms aboard merchant vessel entering many ports in the world, and consideration of potential escalation of violence due to the presence of arms onboard commercial vessels, issues of safety for the crew and vessel, rules on the use of force, design constraints of vessels to carry additional personnel, union contract issues, insurance and liability issues and many other related factors. We recognize that in appropriate circumstances, on certain vessels determined to be at high risk, properly screened and certified third-party security providers with firearms, operating in compliance with applicable coastal, port and flag state laws can be an effective deterrent to pirate attacks.
The Government is examining the options of recommending, or possibly directing U.S.-flagged vessels to use armed security teams while transiting near Somalia. Some U.S.-flagged owners and operators have used armed security teams while transiting near Somalia and have found it to be an effective anti-piracy tool.
Most recently, MARAD has engaged the marine insurance industry to determine the effects of the piracy situation on insurance rates and to determine the effects on insurance if vessels carry armed security personnel aboard. MARAD will continue to work with industry to determine whether and to what extent armed security might be used aboard commercial vessels in certain circumstances.
It is clear that combating international piracy is no small effort, evidenced by its long history. Much work has already taken place, but much remains to be done, before international piracy can be eliminated. Due to its unique and positive relationship with U.S.-flag and international vessel owners, MARAD has maintained a vital role in the development of U.S. anti-piracy policy. Additionally, through its training role, MARAD provides a valuable service to the commercial fleet.
Mr. Chairman, the Department of Transportation stands ready to assist in any way possible to address piracy and any other issue that threatens the national and economic security of the United States and our allies.
Thanks you again for holding this hearing today. I will be happy to answer any questions you might have.
U.S. Transportation
Secretary Ray LaHood Announces $75 Million in Federal Funding for Eastside
Extension of Portland Streetcar Loop
U.S. Company Oregon Ironworks, Inc. to
Manufacture Seven New Streetcars
The U.S. Department of Transportation today announced $75 million in federal funding for the Portland Streetcar expansion, a major boost for communities surrounding the $127 million, 18-station, 3.3-mile eastside extension, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said today.
“This streetcar project will not only offer Portland residents additional options for getting around, but will also spur economic development along the line and create opportunities for employment,” LaHood said.
Secretary LaHood and members of the Oregon Congressional delegation announced the Portland project as part of the Department’s ongoing livable communities initiative to promote sustainable surface transportation programs that are more safe, reliable and cost-effective for commuters.
The proposed extension, across the Willamette River from the existing Westside Streetcar Loop, will connect to 10th Street and Lovejoy in the Pearl District northwest of downtown Portland, and then run south along Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard and Grand Avenue, terminating near the Oregon Museum of Science and Industry (OMSI).
Upon completion, the eastside extension of the Portland Streetcar Loop will include 18 new stations, seven new vehicles and significant capital improvements to the Broadway Bridge to accommodate streetcar operations. Oregon Ironworks, Inc., based in Clackamas, Oregon, will manufacture the seven new vehicles.
The proposed service will operate every 12 minutes during weekday peak periods. Revenue operations will begin in 2011. The line is expected to carry approximately 8,700 passengers daily.
A portion of the total project cost is being funded by FTA’s Small Starts program, aimed at promoting less costly but effective transit projects. To be eligible for the program, the request for Small Starts funding must be no greater than $75 million and the total project cost must be less than $250 million.
U.S. DOT Doubles
Roof Strength Standard for Light Vehicles
Announces First Ever Standards for Heavier
Vehicles
U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood today announced tough, new roof standards that will significantly strengthen vehicle roof structures and improve rollover crash protection.
“Rollovers are the deadliest crashes on our highways and today’s rule will help occupants survive these horrific events,” said Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood.
The new regulation from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration will double the current roof strength requirement for light vehicles weighing up to 6,000 pounds. It specifies that both the driver and passenger sides of the roof must be capable of withstanding a force equal to three times the weight of the vehicle.
The current standard calls for roofs to withstand 1.5 times the weight of the vehicle, applied to one side of the roof, for light vehicles up to 6,000 pounds.
Heavier vehicles from 6,000 to 10,000 pounds, which have never been regulated, must now have both sides of the roof capable of withstanding a force equal to 1.5 times the weight of the vehicle.
The phase-in schedule, which begins in September 2012, will be completed for all affected vehicles by the 2017 model year.
Secretary LaHood also reminded Americans that wearing a safety belt will significantly improve the chance of survival in a rollover crash. They keep people in their seats and can prevent them from being ejected in rollover crashes
“These new standards go a long way
toward reducing deaths, but safety belts are the first, most important step
everyone should take to protecting themselves and their families,” he said.
The tougher roof crush requirements are part of a comprehensive plan to
address rollover crashes, which kill about 10,000 people annually. That
approach includes a mandated electronic stability control system, which helps
prevent the rollover from occurring.
The final rule will be available later today on NHTSA’s website. www.nhtsa.gov
U.S. DOT Announces New Consumer Program for Child Safety Seats
The U.S. Department of Transportation announced today that it will create a new consumer program to help parents and caregivers find a child seat that fits in their vehicle. The new program is the result of a comprehensive review ordered by Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood to improve child passenger safety and Federal child seat standards.
Secretary LaHood also ordered the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to develop a new side impact safety standard for car seats. Side impact crashes account for one-third of all highway deaths among children under thirteen years old.
The internal review found that current standards, which require child seats to withstand forces that are more severe than 99.5 percent of real-world crashes, are effective. However, Secretary LaHood urged NHTSA to do better.
“Infants and children are our most
precious cargo,” said Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. “We need to
constantly improve our track record and help parents to choose a child seat
that fits in their vehicle.”
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration task force, which reviewed
child safety regulations, was comprised of a team of 30 experts. The team
found that while current standards offer a high degree of protection, the
agency should consider adding a first ever side-impact standard for child
safety seats. It also recommended research on future improvements to the
current frontal impact standard.
NHTSA will institute a new program beginning with the 2011 model year to make it easier for parents to choose child safety seats. Car manufacturers will recommend specific seats in various price ranges that fit for individual vehicles. Car manufacturers including Nissan and others in Europe already provide similar recommendations.
The review also found that half of all children between the ages of zero to seven years of age, who were killed in motor vehicle crashes, were not in child safety seats.
“A child safety seat cannot do its job if it’s not used at all,” said Secretary LaHood. “Parents and caregivers need to make sure their children are buckled up properly and child seats are installed correctly.”
BTS Releases Summary 2008
Traffic Data for U.S and Foreign Airlines;
Total Passengers Down 3.5 Percent from 2007
The number of scheduled
domestic and international passengers on U.S. airlines and on flights to and
from the United States on foreign airlines declined in 2008 by 3.5 percent
from 2007, dropping to 809 million, the Bureau of Transportation Statistics
(BTS), a part of the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Research and
Innovative Technology Administration (RITA), today reported.
A news release summarizing the data may be obtained at
http://www.bts.gov/press_releases/2009/bts019_09/html/bts019_09.html.
Airline traffic data can be found on the BTS website at TranStats, the
Intermodal Transportation Database at
http://transtats.bts.gov.
Click on “Aviation,” then on “Air Carrier Statistics (Form 41 Traffic),” then
on “T-100 Domestic Market.”
FAA Bird Strike Database Will Be
Available to Public On Friday
Proposal to Protect the Data Will be Withdrawn
WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) will make its entire Bird Strike database available on a public website this Friday, April 24. Portions of the database have been publicly available since the information was first collected in 1990, but the public will now be able to access all of the database’s fields.
The FAA is also withdrawing a proposal to protect the data, after a 30-day comment period closed earlier this week. The FAA has determined that it can release the data without jeopardizing aviation safety.
The FAA has redacted a very small amount of data in the database containing privacy information, such as personal phone numbers.
Over the next four months, the FAA will make significant improvements to the database to improve the search function and make it more user-friendly. In its current format, users will only be able to perform limited searches online, but will be able to download the entire database.
The FAA also plans to work with the aviation community to find ways to improve and strengthen bird strike reporting.
The database can be accessed through http://wildlife-mitigation.tc.faa.gov/public_html/temp.html#access.
Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood reminded the nation’s governors and state Secretaries of Transportation today that any money they save on transportation projects paid for with American Recovery and Reinvestment Act dollars must be used for additional transportation projects.
Across the country, reports are showing that contractor bids to build and repair transportation networks are coming in substantially below the original engineering estimates. In some cases, thanks to fierce competition for the work and the low price of petroleum, bids are 10, 20 and even 30 percent lower than expected.
In a letter, Secretary LaHood urged the governors and transportation secretaries to take those cost savings and use the money for additional projects that will put more people to work.
“We will work with you to ensure that your state benefits from your frugality,” LaHood wrote. “Savings you accrue from awarding low bids, and from reduced construction costs due to your oversight and project management should remain in your state to be spent on other eligible transportation projects.”
In just seven weeks, the Department of Transportation has approved over 2,400 requests worth $7.5 billion for highway, road, bridge and airport construction and repairs nationwide. Projects have been approved in every state. DOT economists estimate that over 39,000 job-years will be created just from the projects approved so far.
The Obama Administration is committed to getting ARRA dollars into the economy as quickly as possible in order to get the economy back on track. A group of senior officials from across the Department of Transportation, known as the Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) team is monitoring the program to make sure the money is rapidly made available and that the spending is closely monitored and transparent to the public.
###
Letter from Secretary Ray LaHood to Governors - PDF is attached
Our Recovery Act investments in transportation are off to a great start. In just seven weeks, our department has approved over $7.5 billion in state requests for highway, road, bridge and airport construction and repairs nationwide. Projects have been approved in every state. Our economists estimate that over 39,000 job-years will be created just from the projects that we have approved so far.
It is especially gratifying to read reports that contractor bids to build and repair our transportation networks are coming in substantially below state expectations. Across the country, bids are 10-20% less than the engineers’ estimates. As you hold the line on costs, Americans benefit. We can build more projects with the savings, reducing traffic congestion and creating more jobs. We are, quite literally, getting America moving again.
Obviously, these additional jobs and infrastructure benefits happen only if the cost savings are put to work in new transportation projects. President Obama’s policy is that all savings will be reinvested in eligible transportation projects, and only in those projects. This was also the clear intent of Congress when it approved the Recovery Act.
Therefore, whenever federally-assisted Recovery Act transportation projects are awarded, or constructed, at less than the originally estimated cost, any federal dollars that are not used for that particular project must be used for other projects consistent with the original Recovery Act appropriation. Money saved from Recovery Act-funded highway projects, for example, may be used for transit and rail. But funds saved must only be used for eligible transportation projects.
We will work with you to ensure that your state benefits from your frugality. Savings you accrue from awarding low bids, and from reduced construction costs due to your oversight and project management should remain in your state to be spent on other eligible transportation projects.
The transportation community is the public face of the Recovery Act. As the summer road construction season begins, motorists will see workers at work, thanks to the Recovery Act. We are creating jobs. Just as importantly, we are creating hope.
I look forward to working with you to make that hope a reality.
You are subscribed to DOT News for Department of Transportation. This information has recently been updated, and is now available
U.S. Transportation Secretary
LaHood Praises Efforts of FAA Air Traffic Controllers Who Helped Land Plane
After Pilot Died At Controls
U.S. Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood last night praised the actions of
air traffic controllers at Southwest Florida International Airport in Ft.
Myers and Miami Center who helped a distressed passenger safely land a
twin-engine plane after the pilot died at the controls shortly after take-off.
“I really wanted to applaud you for using your good skills and good common
sense to bring this plane down safely,” Secretary LaHood told Ft. Myers Tracon
controller Dan Favio by phone, describing his efforts and those of his fellow
controllers as “heroic.”
Secretary LaHood has also reached out to controller Brian Norton, who worked
with Favio in Ft. Myers, and flight instructor Kari Sorenson, a friend of
Favio’s who helped relay important information about the plane to the
controllers.
The three men helped passenger Doug White gain control of the plane and land
after the pilot suffered an apparent heart attack with no warning. White had
previously flown single-engine planes, but was not familiar with the
twin-engine King Air 200. The other passengers on the plane were White’s wife
and two teenaged daughters.
Favio came to the Federal Aviation Administration six months ago after
previous air traffic control experience in the military and at a private
contract tower. He has also logged some flight time as a pilot in
single-engine planes. He quickly enlisted the help of Sorenson, who has
thousands of hours of experience in the King Air 200.
With Sorenson’s detailed guidance on air speed, flap control and trim
settings, the controllers helped White line up for the approach into Ft. Myers
and land safely on his first attempt.
“You did great work and I really appreciate it,” LaHood told Favio.
LaHood also praised the efforts of controllers at Miami Center, who received
the first emergency radio call from White and calmed him down before passing
him over to their colleagues at Ft. Myers.
DOT Proposes Continental, US Airways for New U.S.-Brazil Air Services
The U.S. Department of Transportation today proposed to award Continental Airlines and US Airways new rights to fly to Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. If the decision is finalized, Continental could operate a new daily nonstop roundtrip flight from Houston as early as June 1 and US Airways could begin a new daily nonstop roundtrip flight from Charlotte, NC on Oct. 1.
In its preliminary decision, the Department noted that US Airways, the only applicant not currently serving Brazil, would inject new competition into the market as well as provide the first direct Brazil service from Charlotte, where US Airways has a significant connecting hub. Continental’s service from Houston would be the carrier’s first year-round nonstop service to Rio de Janeiro, as well as the only year-round nonstop flights to that city from the central or western United States, the Department said. Other carriers filing applications were Delta Air Lines, seeking to provide additional daily service between Atlanta and Rio de Janeiro, and American Airlines, seeking rights to offer three weekly New York-Rio de Janeiro flights.
The rights tentatively awarded today are made available under the second and third stages of a June 2008 U.S.-Brazil aviation agreement that, among other provisions, increased weekly U.S.-Brazil passenger flights for each country’s airlines from 105 to 154 in four stages. In August 2008, the Department awarded American 11 new weekly flights and Delta 10 under the first-stage. The 14 remaining weekly flights, available in October 2010, will be awarded in a future proceeding.
Objections to the show-cause order must be filed within ten days. If objections are filed, answers are due seven days afterward. The Department will then issue a final decision. The show-cause order, carrier applications and other documents in the case are available on the Internet at www.regulations.gov, docket DOT-OST-2009-0003.
Testimony for Department of Transportation. This information has recently been updated, and is
now available.
U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood today
announced that he has created a team at the U.S. Department of Transportation
(DOT) to coordinate the Department’s role in President Obama’s economic
recovery program. The team will ensure that economic recovery funding is
rapidly made available for transportation infrastructure projects and that
project spending is monitored and transparent.
The team, known as the Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery
(TIGER) team, is composed of officials from across the Department’s operating
administrations and offices. The team is co-chaired by Lana Hurdle, deputy
assistant secretary for budget and programs, and Joel Szabat, deputy assistant
secretary for transportation policy.
“We created the TIGER team to make sure that DOT’s portion of recovery funding
goes out to states and localities as quickly as possible in order to
immediately create jobs and strengthen our economy and transportation
systems,” Secretary LaHood said.
The team will identify and prioritize key highway, bridge, transit, rail,
aviation and intermodal spending. The team also will develop reporting
standards to accurately track the money as it is being spent and ensure that
all accountability requirements are being met.
The Department’s chief economist and Performance Management Office will coordinate with the Office of Management and Budget and other White Office offices on the performance measures that will be used to track job creation and other indications of the impact of each infrastructure investment.
The value of trade using surface transportation between the United States and its North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) partners Canada and Mexico was 13.8 percent lower in November 2008 than in November 2007, dropping to $60.7 billion, the biggest year-to-year decline in almost eight years, the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), a part of the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA), reported today.
A news release and summary tables can be found at
www.dot.gov/affairs/briefing.htm. More information on transborder freight data and data from previous months are posted on the BTS website at http://www.bts.gov/transborder/.
Additional information about air fares in the third quarter, including average fares for the top 100 airports, and about ATPI, including indexes for foreign-origin itineraries and the top 85 air travel markets based on originating passengers, can be found on the BTS website,
http://www.bts.gov/xml/atpi/src/index.xml.Multiple airport areas for which a single
average fare calculation is available are: Boston, Chicago, Dallas-Fort Worth,
Houston, Los Angeles, New York, San Francisco and Washington, DC.
Airports covered by average fare calculations are:
Alabama: Birmingham
Arizona : Phoenix, Tucson
Arkansas: Little Rock
California: Burbank, Fresno, Long Beach, Los Angeles Intl, Oakland,
Ontario/San Bernardino, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, San Jose, Santa
Ana (Orange County)
Colorado : Colorado Springs, Denver
Connecticut : Hartford
District of Columbia : Dulles, Reagan National
Florida : Ft. Lauderdale, Ft. Myers, Jacksonville, Miami, Orlando, Pensacola,
Sarasota/Bradenton, Tampa, West Palm Beach
Georgia: Atlanta, Savannah
Idaho: Boise
Illinois: Chicago Midway, Chicago O'Hare
Indiana: Indianapolis
Iowa: Des Moines
Kansas: Wichita
Kentucky: Louisville
Louisiana: New Orleans
Maine: Portland
Maryland: Baltimore
Massachusetts: Boston
Michigan: Detroit, Grand Rapids, Flint
Minnesota: Minneapolis/St. Paul
Mississippi: Jackson/Vicksburg
Missouri: Kansas City, St. Louis
Nebraska: Omaha
Nevada: Las Vegas, Reno
New Hampshire: Manchester
New Jersey: Newark
New Mexico: Albuquerque
New York: Albany, Buffalo, Islip, New York JFK, New York LaGuardia, Newburgh,
Rochester, Syracuse, White Plains
North Carolina: Charlotte, Greensboro, Raleigh/Durham
Ohio: Akron/Canton, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus, Dayton
Oklahoma: Oklahoma City, Tulsa
Oregon: Portland
Pennsylvania: Harrisburg, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh
Rhode Island: Providence
South Carolina: Charleston, Greenville/Spartanburg
Tennessee: Knoxville, Memphis, Nashville
Texas: Austin, Dallas Love, Dallas/Ft. Worth, El Paso, Houston Bush, Houston
Hobby, Lubbock, San Antonio
Utah: Salt Lake City
Vermont: Burlington
Virginia: Norfolk, Richmond
Washington: Seattle, Spokane
Wisconsin: Madison, Milwaukee
The American people can be confident and assured by the miraculous outcome of the U.S. Airways splashdown in the Hudson river that was the result of years of diligent work and training by safety professionals, brilliant actions of the pilot and his crew, heroic recovery efforts of first responders, and FAA employees who have created the safety standards that worked yesterday. Not a single family will receive disappointing news. The efforts of everyone who played a part in this incredible story, who trained and practiced to be ready, indeed performed. And 155 souls remain with us today. I want to congratulate everyone for this superb effort, both those who were visible in New York and those who worked behind the scenes. We at DOT will continue to work hard to keep our aviation system the safest in the world.
U.S. scheduled passenger airlines employed 6.5 percent fewer workers in November 2008 than in November 2007, the fifth consecutive decrease in full-time equivalent employee (FTE) levels for the scheduled passenger carriers from the same month of the previous year and the largest year-to-year decrease since November 2005, the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), a part of the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA), reported today.
November Airline On-Time Performance Improves from Last Year
The nation’s largest airlines had a higher rate of on-time flights this past November than in the same month last year, although the rate of delays was higher than in October 2008, according to the Air Travel Consumer Report released today by the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT).
According to information filed with the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), a part of DOT’s Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA), the 19 carriers reporting on-time performance recorded an overall on-time arrival rate of 83.3 percent in November, an improvement over November 2007’s 80.0 percent but below October 2008’s 86.0 percent.
The monthly report also includes data on lengthy tarmac delays, flight cancellations and the causes of flight delays by the reporting carriers, as well as information on reports of mishandled baggage filed with the carriers and consumer service, disability and discrimination complaints received by DOT’s Aviation Consumer Protection Division. This report also includes reports of incidents involving pets traveling by air, as required to be filed by U.S. carriers.
Cancellations
The consumer report includes BTS data on the number of domestic flights canceled by the reporting carriers. In November, the carriers canceled 0.8 percent of their scheduled domestic flights, lower than the 1.0 percent cancellation rate of November 2007 but higher than the 0.6 percent rate posted in October 2008.
Tarmac Delays
In November, the carriers filing on-time performance data reported that .00002 percent of their scheduled flights had tarmac delays of three hours or more, down from .0001 percent in October, the first month carriers reported this data. BTS is reviewing other parts of the tarmac data reported by carriers for October and the following months. Data will be released when the review is completed.
Causes of Flight Delays
In November, the carriers filing on-time performance data reported that 6.58 percent of their flights were delayed by aviation system delays, compared to 5.17 percent in October; 4.79 percent by late-arriving aircraft, compared to 3.93 percent in October; 3.89 percent by factors within the airline’s control, such as maintenance or crew problems, compared to 3.86 percent in October; 0.37 percent by extreme weather, compared to 0.26 percent in October; and 0.02 percent for security reasons, compared to 0.03 percent in October. Weather is a factor in both the extreme-weather category and the aviation-system category. This includes delays due to the re-routing of flights by DOT’s Federal Aviation Administration in consultation with the carriers involved. Weather is also a factor in delays attributed to late-arriving aircraft, although airlines do not report specific causes in that category.
Data collected by BTS also shows the percentage of late flights delayed by weather, including those reported in either the category of extreme weather or included in National Aviation System delays. In November, 42.08 percent of late flights were delayed by weather, up 11.26 percent from November 2007, when 37.82 percent of late flights were delayed by weather, and up 22.01 percent from October when 34.49 percent of late flights were delayed by weather.
Detailed information on flight delays and their causes is available on the BTS site on the World Wide Web at
http://www.bts.gov.Mishandled Baggage
The U.S. carriers reporting flight delays and mishandled baggage data posted a mishandled baggage rate of 3.75 reports per 1,000 passengers in November, an improvement over November 2007’s rate of 4.90 but up from October 2008’s 3.55 rate.
Incidents Involving Pets
In November, carriers reported six incidents involving pets while traveling by air, compared to three incidents in October. November’s incidents involved three deaths, two injuries and one lost pet.
Complaints About Airline Service
In November, the Department received 532 complaints about airline service from consumers, down 34.3 percent from the 810 complaints filed in November 2007 and 15.2 percent fewer than the total of 627 received in October 2008.
Complaints About Treatment of Disabled Passengers
The report also contains a tabulation of complaints filed with DOT in November against airlines regarding the treatment of passengers with disabilities. The Department received a total of 28 disability-related complaints in November, 31.7 percent fewer than the 41 complaints received in November 2007 and 30.0 percent fewer than the total of 40 filed in October 2008.
Complaints About Discrimination
In November, the Department received seven complaints alleging discrimination by airlines due to factors other than disability – such as race, religion, national origin or sex – up from the three complaints recorded in November 2007 but down from the total of 10 filed in October 2008.
Consumers may file their complaints in writing with the Aviation Consumer Protection Division, U.S. Department of Transportation, C-75, W96-432, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, DC 20590; by voice mail at (202) 366-2220 or by TTY at (202) 366-0511; or on the web at
http://airconsumer.ost.dot.gov.Consumers who want on-time performance data for specific flights should call their airline’s reservation number or their travel agent. This information is available on the computerized reservation systems used by these agents.
The Air Travel Consumer Report can be found on DOT’s World Wide Web site at
http://airconsumer.dot.gov. It is available in “pdf” and Microsoft Word format.-END-
AIR TRAVEL CONSUMER REPORT
November 2008
KEY ON-TIME PERFORMANCE AND
FLIGHT CANCELLATION STATISTICS
Based on Data Filed with the Bureau of Transportation Statistics
by the 19 Reporting Carriers
Overall
83.3 percent on-time arrivals
Highest On-Time Arrival Rates
Lowest On-Time Arrival Rates
Most Frequently Delayed Flights
1. ExpressJet Airlines flight 2396 from Newark, NJ to Detroit – late 83.33 percent of the time
2. Comair flight 6517 from Atlanta to Austin, TX – late 82.76 percent of the time
2. SkyWest Airlines flight 4393 from Atlanta to San Antonio, TX – late 82.76 percent of the time
4. Southwest Airlines flight 3091 from Pittsburgh to Philadelphia – late 81.82 percent of the time
5. Mesa Airlines flight 2697 from Washington Dulles to Charlotte, NC – late 80.95 percent of the time
Flights with Longest Tarmac Delays
ExpressJet Airlines flight 2534 from Nashville, TN to Newark, NJ, 11/30/08 – delayed on tarmac 269 minutes
(This was the only flight with a reported tarmac delay of four hours or more in November)
Highest Rates of Canceled Flights
1. Mesa Airlines – 1.3 percent
2. Pinnacle Airlines – 1.3 percent
3. Comair – 1.2 percent
Lowest Rates of Canceled Flights
1. Continental Airlines – 0.1 percent
2. Northwest Airlines – 0.2 percent
3. Frontier Airlines – 0.2 percent
New August Data Show Americans Drove 15 Billion Fewer Miles than a Year Ago, U.S. Transportation Secretary Mary Peters Announces
Travel Changes Demonstrate Need for New Way to Fund Transportation
DALLAS – New federal data show Americans are continuing a 10-month-long decline in driving habits, U.S. Secretary of Transportation Mary Peters announced today. The decline is putting new pressure on the way road, bridge and transit projects are funded at a time of record growth in transit ridership, showing the need for a new approach for funding transportation construction, she added
“We pay for transit the same way we pay for road and bridge projects – with federal gas taxes,” said Secretary Peters, who made the announcement during a visit to a light rail station under construction in Dallas . “Relying on the gas tax is like relying on cardboard to keep the rain out – the longer you use it the less it works.”
In August 2008, Americans drove 15 billion fewer miles, or 5.6 percent less, than they did in August 2007 – the largest ever year-to-year decline recorded in a single month, Secretary Peters said. She added that over the past 10 months, Americans have driven 78 billion fewer miles than they did in the same 10 months the previous year. Texans alone drove 1.3 million fewer miles, the Secretary added.
Transit ridership, meanwhile, saw an increase of 6.2 percent this summer compared to last, said Secretary Peters. In Texas , the DART rail system saw an increase of 15 percent this summer, one of the largest in its 12-year history, she noted.
She said that since 2001, the Department has invested over $8 billion to finance over 280 miles worth of new transit lines, which, taken together, would be 25 percent longer than the New York City subway system. She warned that future projects, however, could be at risk if we continue to rely on gas taxes to fund transit construction.
She said a plan to significantly reform federal transportation policy the Administration unveiled earlier this year would address that challenge by making it easier for states to attract new sources of funding for transportation projects. “With this new approach to funding transportation projects, we can ensure that Big D has Grade-A transit service for years to come.”
To review the FHWA’s “Traffic Volume Trends” reports for August 2008, visit http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/tvtw/tvtpage.htm.
U.S. scheduled passenger airlines employed 2.1 percent fewer workers in August 2008 than in August 2007, the second consecutive decrease in full-time equivalent employee (FTE) levels for the scheduled passenger carriers from the same month of the previous year and the largest year-to-year decrease since October 2006, the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), a part of the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA), reported today.
A news release and summary tables can be found at www.bts.gov. More information on airline employment and data from previous years are posted on the BTS website at http://www.bts.gov/programs/airline_information/number_of_employees/
BTS Releases July 2008 Airline Traffic Data;
Seven-Month 2008 System Traffic Down 0.8 Percent from 2007 and Down 2.9
Percent in July
The number of scheduled domestic and international passengers on
U.S. airlines during the first seven months of 2008 declined by 0.8 percent
from the same period in 2007, dropping to 448.5 million, 3.6 million less
than a year earlier, the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), a part
of the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Research and Innovative
Technology Administration (RITA), today reported in a release of preliminary
data.
A news release summarizing the data may be obtained at
www.dot.gov/affairs/briefing.htm. Airline traffic data can be found on
the BTS website at TranStats, the Intermodal Transportation Database at
http://transtats.bts.gov.
Click on “Aviation,” then on “Air Carrier Statistics (Form 41 Traffic),”
then on “T-100 Domestic Market.”
“Congress has acted quickly to protect states from the pain of a funding shortfall, but the fundamental problems that plague the nation’s transportation system are far from healed. Congress must now address the pressing need for meaningful reforms to the way we raise and invest transportation funds with the same bipartisan spirit and energy as it did in voting for these additional resources.”
WASHINGTON, DC – The Federal Highway Administration announced today that it did not approve an application from the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation and Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission to place tolls on Interstate 80. The agency said the planned use of toll revenues does not meet federal requirements as there is no basis to conclude that the proposed lease payments are legitimate operating costs.
“Tolling interstates is a viable option for many states to fund highway improvements or to improve performance conditions,” Highway Administrator Tom Madison said. “Because we are legally bound to ensure applications for this program meet all congressionally mandated requirements, however, we are regrettably unable to approve this application.”
The revised application seeking tolling authority under the Interstate System Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Pilot Program was submitted to the Federal Highway Administration on July 22, 2008. Under the proposal, PennDOT would transfer I-80 to the Turnpike Commission and make payments.
The Federal Highway Administration said the Commonwealth’s application did not meet legal requirements for the correct use of toll revenue. Specifically, the application called for the Turnpike Commission to use toll revenue to pay annual lease payments to PennDOT. The federal agency noted that while under the program toll revenue can be used for lease payments, the amount of the payment is required to be based on an objective market valuation.
The Commission’s application, however, included no information or data justifying the proposed amount for the annual toll payment or establishing that the level was based on an objective market valuation. The agency noted that earlier this year it had asked for just such justification as it reviewed the tolling application. The Commission, however, sent no additional information supporting the lease payment level, the agency said.
“There is simply no evidence that the lease payments are related to the actual costs of acquiring an interest in the facility,” explained Administrator Madison. “Although we are unable to move the application forward, we stand ready to assist the Commonwealth in finding creative ways to address its transportation needs.”
U.S. Secretary of Transportation Mary E. Peters today directed the Federal Aviation Administration to implement 13 new safety recommendations from an independent review team tasked with reviewing the current U.S. aviation safety system.
“The mark of an effective safety system is its ability to constantly improve and adapt. Today, the Independent Review Team has delivered a blueprint that will assure continued safe skies ahead for America,” Secretary Peters said.
The Secretary said the team’s report confirms the basic approach to aviation safety in the United States has generated unprecedented results, but that there are ways to make the system even safer. She said the 13 recommendations in the report “will improve both the intensity and the integrity of the FAA’s safety program,” and that the agency will begin implementing the recommendations immediately.
A key recommendation by the review team, Secretary Peters committed that the FAA will have guidance in place by the end of the year to ensure that airworthiness directives and their deadlines are fully understood by all appropriate FAA officials and airlines.
Another recommendation called for more rigorous and systematic oversight of the FAA’s voluntary disclosure program. The Secretary noted that the FAA has changed its procedures to require senior managers to review voluntary disclosure reports. She said that moving forward, FAA also will implement use of a new automated data system to help track and ensure compliance.
The Independent Review Team also recommended
new safeguards against FAA personnel developing “overly cozy” relationships
with the airlines they regulate through regular audits of field offices
where the managerial team has been in place for more than three years. “The
intent is clear: make sure everyone understands that the only customer that
matters in the end is the flying public,” Secretary Peters said.
Consistent with recommendations to improve the FAA’s safety culture, the
Secretary also charged the agency with developing, and having underway
within six months, a new training program for safety managers and
inspectors.
By this time next year, the Secretary announced, the FAA will also have the
results of the recommended study of the right balance between the time
inspectors spend inputting and analyzing data and the time they spend in the
field. “Understanding safety data is essential, but making sure it is
accurate is vital,” the Secretary said.
Members of the Independent Review Team include Ambassador Edward W. Stimpson, who served as chairman; J. Randolph Babbitt; William O. McCabe; Malcolm K. Sparrow; and the Hon. Carl W. Vogt.
The access the Independent Review Team’s full report, go to www.dot.gov/affairs/IRT_Report.pdf.
###
The Independent Review Team’s 13 Aviation
Safety Recommendations
Recommendation 1: The FAA should retain the right to ground any plane not in compliance with an applicable AD. Inspectors should not be required or expected to conduct any type of risk-assessment before taking action on AD non-compliance.
ACCEPTED – FAA’s ongoing review of AD compliance will address inspector requirements and expectations. The full AD review program will be implemented by December 30, 2008.
Recommendation 2: The FAA should provide timely information about new AD
requirements, in advance of compliance dates, to all relevant FAA field
offices. Those offices should then be responsive to any carrier that
requests assistance in the form of progress-towards-compliance audits or
reviews, in advance of the AD compliance dates.
ACCEPTED – FAA’s ongoing review of AD compliance will address information dissemination and carrier requests among others. The full AD review program will be implemented by December 30, 2008.
Recommendation 3: The FAA’s Voluntary Programs are vitally important to the
future of aviation safety, and should be retained. [Main report paragraph
5.1]
ACCEPTED – The FAA will continue to enhance its Voluntary Disclosure Programs.
Recommendation 4: The FAA must abide by the rules circumscribing these
programs in order to prevent the erosion of compliance.
ACCEPTED – The FAA will immediately reinforce the importance of these rules and require higher-level management review of all disclosures.
Recommendation 5: Voluntary Disclosure Reporting Program (VDRP) data have
not been routinely analyzed at a higher level within the FAA. There are two
quite different purposes for such analysis, both of which the FAA should
formally recognize.
ACCEPTED – Data from many sources can be used to make sure these programs are operating effectively. The FAA will immediately begin implementation of a program to gather and analyze this data.
Recommendation 6: The number of voluntary disclosures made by a regulated
entity is a composite measure, and should not be used either as a
performance metric or as a risk-factor, in any context.
ACCEPTED – The FAA will review its risk assessment tools and eliminate areas where there is an incentive to drive down the number of disclosures. This review will be completed and implemented by December 30, 2008.
Recommendation 7: It is clear to the IRT that participation in all of the
voluntary disclosure programs is dependent on the assurance of
confidentiality for information submitted. The IRT believes the FAA should
resist any efforts to relax or eliminate any restrictions on disclosure.
ACCEPTED – This is fundamental to the future of these programs and FAA will stress the importance with all constituencies.
Recommendation 8: The FAA should explicitly focus on wide divergences in
regulatory ideologies, where they exist, as a source for potentially serious
error.
ACCEPTED – To be implemented by December 30, 2008.
Recommendation 9: Training for Managers and Principal Inspectors should
explicitly cover the management of contrasting regulatory views within the
workforce, methods for moderating extremes in regulatory style, and methods
for optimizing the regulatory effectiveness and coherence across a diverse
team of inspectors.
ACCEPTED – To be implemented by March 31, 2009.
Recommendation 10: The FAA should deploy the Internal Assistance Capability
(IAC), recently established, to review the composition and conduct of any
offices or teams identified under recommendation one above.
ACCEPTED – To be implemented by June 30, 2009.
Recommendation 11: The FAA should also deploy the IAC on a routine basis to
review the culture and conduct of any CMO where the managerial team has
remained intact for more than three years.
ACCEPTED – To be implemented by September 30, 2009.
Recommendation 12: The IRT would urge the FAA to embrace its own
operational role in risk identification and risk mitigation as formally and
energetically as it has embraced its role in overseeing industry’s SMS
implementations; and to expedite its implementation planning in this area.
ACCEPTED – The FAA will develop and implement its own internal safety management system before the end of 2010.
Recommendation 13: We recommend that without delay the FAA commission a
time-and-motion study of its front-line inspection operation, to empirically
assess the time-demands of ATOS and other IT implementations. With the
results of such a study in hand, agency leadership should establish some
clear expectations regarding the proportion of an inspector’s work-week that
data-entry, data-analysis, and other computer-related tasks should
reasonably consume, and monitor progress towards more reasonable ratios as
ATOS and other IT systems are improved over time.
ACCEPTED – The study will commence in March 2009 and be completed within one year. Timeframe for implementation will depend on the recommendations.
Airline On-Time Performance Improves in July
Flights operated by the nation’s largest airlines arrived on time at a higher rate this past July than in both the previous month and July 2007, according to the Air Travel Consumer Report released today by the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT).
According to information filed with the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), a part of DOT’s Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA), the 19 carriers reporting on-time performance recorded an overall on-time arrival rate of 75.7 percent in July, higher than both July 2007’s 69.8 percent and June 2008’s 70.8 percent.
The monthly report also includes data on flight cancellations and the causes of flight delays, as well as information on reports of mishandled baggage filed with the carriers and consumer service, disability and discrimination complaints received by DOT’s Aviation Consumer Protection Division. This report also includes reports of incidents involving pets traveling by air, as required to be filed by U.S. carriers.
Cancellations
The consumer report includes BTS data on the number of domestic flights canceled by the reporting carriers. In July, the carriers canceled 1.7 percent of their scheduled domestic flights, lower than both the 2.1 percent cancellation rate of July 2007 and the 1.8 percent rate posted in June 2008.
Causes of Flight Delays
In July, the carriers filing on-time performance data reported that 7.78 percent of their flights were delayed by aviation system delays, compared to 10.16 percent in June; 7.17 percent by late-arriving aircraft, compared to 8.86 percent in June; 6.30 percent by factors within the airline’s control, such as maintenance or crew problems, compared to 6.78 percent in June; 1.01 percent by extreme weather, compared to 1.14 percent in June; and 0.05 percent for security reasons, the same percentage as June. Weather is a factor in both the extreme-weather category and the aviation-system category. This includes delays due to the re-routing of flights by DOT’s Federal Aviation Administration in consultation with the carriers involved. Weather is also a factor in delays attributed to late-arriving aircraft, although airlines do not report specific causes in that category.
Data collected by BTS also shows the percentage of late flights delayed by weather, including those reported in either the category of extreme weather or included in National Aviation System delays. In July, 44.37 percent of late flights were delayed by weather, up 2.83 percent from July 2007, when 43.15 percent of late flights were delayed by weather, and down 6.02 percent from June when 47.21 percent of late flights were delayed by weather.
Detailed information on flight delays and their causes is available on the BTS site on the World Wide Web at http://www.bts.gov.
Mishandled Baggage
The U.S. carriers reporting flight delays and mishandled baggage data posted a mishandled baggage rate of 4.86 reports per 1,000 passengers in July, an improvement over both July 2007’s rate of 7.96 and June 2008’s 5.15 rate.
In July, carriers reported six incidents involving pets while traveling by air, up from five incidents in June. The July incidents involved four deaths, one injury and one lost pet.
Complaints About Airline Service
In July, the department received 1,093 complaints about airline service from consumers, down 36.4 percent from the 1,720 complaints filed in July 2007 but 24.1 percent more than the total of 881 received in June 2008.
Complaints About Treatment of Disabled Passengers
The report also contains a tabulation of complaints filed with DOT in July against specific airlines regarding the treatment of passengers with disabilities. The Department received a total of 65 disability-related complaints in July, up 38.3 percent from the 47 filed in July 2007 and more than double the 27 complaints received in June 2008.
Complaints About Discrimination
In July, the Department received nine complaints alleging discrimination by airlines due to factors other than disability – such as race, religion, national origin or sex – down from the total of 15 complaints received in July 2007 but up from the total of eight received in June 2008.
Consumers may file their complaints in writing with the Aviation Consumer Protection Division, U.S. Department of Transportation, C-75, W96-432, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, DC 20590; by voice mail at (202) 366-2220 or by TTY at (202) 366-0511; or on the web at http://airconsumer.ost.dot.gov.
Consumers who want on-time performance data for specific flights should call their airline’s reservation number or their travel agent. This information is available on the computerized reservation systems used by these agents.
The Air Travel Consumer Report can be found on DOT’s World Wide Web site at http://airconsumer.ost.dot.gov. It is available in “pdf” and Microsoft Word format.
-END-
AIR TRAVEL CONSUMER REPORT
July 2008
KEY ON-TIME PERFORMANCE AND
FLIGHT CANCELLATION STATISTICS
Based on Data Filed with the Bureau of Transportation Statistics
by the 19 Reporting Carriers
Overall
75.7 percent on-time arrivals
Highest On-Time Arrival Rates
Lowest On-Time Arrival Rates
Most Frequently Delayed Flights
1. Comair flight 5292 from Minneapolis/St. Paul to New York JFK – late 100 percent of the time
1. Comair flight 5614 from Charlotte, NC to New York JFK – late 100 percent of the time
1. Comair flight 5491 from Albany, NY to New York JFK – late 100 percent of the time
1. Comair flight 5739 from New York JFK to Pittsburgh – late 100 percent of the time
5. Comair flight 5440 from Washington Dulles to New York JFK – late 96.77 percent of the time
Highest Rates of Canceled Flights
1. Comair – 4.5 percent
2. United Airlines – 3.2 percent
3. JetBlue Airways – 3.2 percent
Lowest Rates of Canceled Flights
1. Frontier Airlines – 0.2 percent
2. Northwest Airlines – 0.6 percent
3. Southwest Airlines – 0.6 percent
U.S. scheduled passenger airlines employed 0.1 percent more workers in June 2008 than in June 2007, the 17th consecutive increase in full-time equivalent employee (FTE) levels for the scheduled passenger carriers from the same month of the previous year but the smallest year-to-year increase since a decrease in January 2007, the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), a part of the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA), reported today.
A news release and summary tables can be found at www.bts.gov. More information on airline employment and data from previous years are posted on the BTS website at http://www.bts.gov/programs/airline_information/number_of_employees/
The federal government is making $1 million available immediately in emergency relief funds for Wisconsin to help pay for urgent repairs to roads and bridges damaged by floods, U.S. Transportation Secretary Mary E. Peters announced today.
“We're making this down payment to help restore essential traffic routes so people can get back to their lives and businesses can begin to recover,” Secretary Peters said.
Secretary Peters said the $1 million quick release was intended to help Wisconsin begin restoring roads that were washed out from the floods, including County Trunk Highway that provides access to Sauk County’s Lake Delton, an important tourist destination and revenue generator for the region.
The Secretary added that the Department would continue to work with officials from Wisconsin and other Midwestern states as they assess the extent of road damage caused by the floods. She said more resources will likely be made available based on those evaluations.
The Federal Highway Administration's emergency relief program provides funds to states for the repair or reconstruction of federal-aid highways damaged by natural disasters or catastrophic events. The program typically works on a reimbursable basis.
In June, the Department provided a $1 million quick release to Iowa as well to repair damage from the Midwest floods.
“We’re committed to bringing back essential transportation links after a
natural disaster strikes,” FHWA Acting Administrator Jim Ray said.
WASHINGTON — Unscrupulous interstate moving companies that violate federal consumer protection and safety regulations will continue to be targeted for investigations and prosecutions by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), which today announced the results of a recently concluded strike force investigation involving nearly 350 moving companies located in 13 states and the District of Columbia. In all, 1,140 violations of federal regulations were recorded, resulting in nearly $325,000 in assessed fines.
“Interstate movers with fraudulent or rogue operations are hereby put on notice: federal investigators will be knocking on your door in the future and you will face serious legal and financial consequences,” FMCSA Administrator John H. Hill said. “During this strike force alone, six companies received federal fines in excess of $27,000.”
From May 5, 2008, through May 16, 2008, FMCSA, in cooperation with state
law enforcement and consumer protection agencies, conducted focused
compliance reviews on carriers hired to transport consumers’ personal
property across state lines. For a list of companies cited during the strike
force, see
http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/hhg-2008-05-results.
The strike force targeted states that received the most complaints in the
National Household Goods Consumer Complaint database (http://nccdb.fmcsa.dot.gov).
In fiscal year 2007, FMCSA received nearly 4,000 complaints.
The compliance reviews were conducted by federal investigators in Arizona, California, the District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Maryland, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Texas and Virginia.
“We owe much of our success to our state partners who eagerly participated in the strike force,” said Rose McMurray, FMCSA chief safety officer and assistant administrator. “Our state counterparts, including state commercial vehicle enforcement units, consumer protection agencies and the state Attorney General offices, were an integral part of this ambitious effort. We will continue working together to protect the public from these rogue and often predatory moving companies.”
Consumers can help identify noncompliant household goods movers by
calling FMCSA's nationwide complaint hotline, 1-888-368-7238 (1-888 DOT-SAFT)
or by visiting
http://nccdb.fmcsa.dot.gov. Prior to selecting a household goods
carrier, consumers should also visit FMCSA’s
www.protectyourmove.gov
for information on planning a successful move and to search movers and their
complaint history.
U.S. Secretary of Transportation Mary E. Peters Announces New Upgrades to the Five Star Safety Rating Program
Consumers will have better, more complete safety information about the vehicles they want to purchase under a new plan to improve the federal government’s automobile crash tests and strengthen its five-star vehicle safety rating system, announced U.S. Transportation Secretary Mary E. Peters today.
“Knowing how many horses a car engine has is important, but knowing how safe a car is before you even step into a dealership ought to be essential,” Secretary Peters said. “We want to make sure consumers can easily take safety into consideration when choosing a new vehicle, along with price, fuel efficiency, size and the color they like best.”
Under the improvements to the five-star safety rating program, vehicles beginning with model year 2010 will for the first time be given an overall safety rating that combines results from frontal, side and rollover tests. The upgraded system also will include new frontal crash tests, and a new side pole test to simulate wrapping a vehicle around a tree, the Secretary said. She said female crash dummies will be added to the tests, so women and larger children are represented, and that new testing for leg injuries will be done.
Also for the first time, Secretary Peters said, a new rating on emerging advanced technologies will be added so consumers will know whether specific crash avoidance technologies, namely electronic stability control, lane departure warning systems and forward collision warning systems, are optional or standard features on new vehicles.
“Enhanced Government Safety Ratings are intended to further the continuous advancement of vehicle safety,” said National Highway Traffic Safety Administrator, Nicole R. Nason. “In addition to providing important information to consumers, the ratings encourage vehicle manufacturers to continue to design vehicles that reach an even higher level of safety.”
Each year, NHTSA performs rollover and crash tests on new cars and trucks and assigns them a safety rating available on the window label of new vehicles. For nearly 30 years, Secretary Peters said, the five star safety rating system has been the catalyst for encouraging major safety improvements to new vehicle design. For more information on upgrades to the Government Safety Ratings System, visit http://www.nhtsa.gov/staticfiles/DOT/NHTSA/Rulemaking/Rules/Associated%20Files/NCAP_Final_Notice_July_08.pdf.
Statement of The Honorable Tyler Duvall
Acting Under Secretary for Policy
U.S. Department of Transportation
before the
Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming
U.S. House of Representatives
Hearing on Improving Automobile Fuel Economy
June 26, 2008
Mr. Chairman, I am Tyler Duvall, Acting Under Secretary for Policy for the Department of Transportation. I appreciate the opportunity to appear before the Committee to discuss our most recent proposal for substantial increases in the fuel economy standards. These increases are needed more than ever to achieve energy independence and security and reduce carbon dioxide emissions.
The demand for petroleum is steadily increasing around the world and here in the U.S. Altogether, the U.S. consumes about 25 percent of the total amount of petroleum consumed worldwide. Much of that petroleum goes to providing us the mobility on which our economy depends. Sixty percent of the petroleum needed to meet that demand is imported.
The U.S. produces an estimated 23 percent of the world’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Carbon dioxide is the predominant GHG emitted by human sources. As EPA has said, carbon dioxide is responsible for about 95 percent of transportation GHG emissions, with all of the other emissions combined accounting for the remaining 5 percent of GHG emissions. The transportation sector is the largest and fastest growing source of domestic carbon dioxide emissions, producing approximately 30 percent of the nation’s total.
The problems posed by light vehicle fuel consumption and carbon dioxide emissions have a common solution. Carbon dioxide is a natural by-product of the combustion of fuel in light vehicles. Given that tailpipe emissions of carbon dioxide cannot be destroyed or feasibly captured by control technologies in light vehicles, the feasible way to make the most substantial reductions in their tailpipe emissions of carbon dioxide now and for the foreseeable future is to reduce fuel consumption.
This fundamental scientific reality was the basis for the President’s “Twenty in Ten” proposal to reduce domestic gasoline consumption by 20 percent in 2017. A key component of his proposal was a significant increase in fuel economy standards for cars and light trucks. By increasing standards beginning in model year 2010 for cars and in model year 2012 for light trucks, the President’s aggressive proposal was projected to save up to 8.5 billion gallons of gasoline in 2017 alone and reduce consumption by 5 percent. These amounts were based on an assumption that, on average, fuel economy standards for both light trucks and passenger cars would increase 4 percent per year.
To enable us to increase the car standards responsibly, the President asked Congress to give us the authority to set attribute-based car standards just as we had set attribute-based light truck standards. We took that step in response to the safety concerns expressed by the National Academy of Science in a congressionally mandated report. NAS said that significantly and quickly increasing the fuel economy standards without first reforming the standards by making them attribute-based would likely lead to the further downsizing of vehicles and thus to additional deaths and injuries on our highways.
In December of last year, Congress opened the way to substantial increases in the car standards when it enacted the Energy Information and Security Act (EISA). EISA mandated that the car standards and light truck standards be set high enough to ensure that the combined industry-wide average reaches at least 35 mpg in model year 2020. It not only gave us the authority to set attribute-based car standards, but also mandated that both car and light truck standards must be attribute-based.
Using the guidance and new tools provided by EISA, we have proposed standards for model years 2011 to 2015. Those standards are based in large measure on the joint work of the technical staffs of our agency and the Environmental Protection Agency. Our staffs met nearly daily for seven months and completely revamped the foundations of CAFE rulemaking. For example, they reviewed and revised the list of technologies that will be available during those years and updated the estimated costs and effectiveness figures for those technologies. In addition, they updated and refined assumptions, methodologies and models.
Our proposed fuel economy standards were developed with the aid of cost-benefit analysis. We updated our benefit estimates as well as our cost estimates. The benefits consist primarily of three things: the fuel saved, the contribution that fuel savings makes to energy security and independence, and the reduction in carbon dioxide emissions resulting from that fuel savings. We updated the dollar values of the first two and for the first time placed a value on the third. We recognize that there are uncertainties regarding each of these values and have requested public comments on all of them. We then conducted a balancing that ensured every dollar we ask companies to spend for better fuel economy returns at least one dollar’s worth of benefits.
The proposed standards would increase fuel economy 4.5 percent per year over the 5-year period ending in 2015. This rate substantially exceeds not only the 3.3 percent per year needed on average to meet the 35 mpg minimum established by Congress last year, but also the 4 percent per year increase called for in the President’s Twenty-in-Ten proposal. An average annual increase of only 2.1% for combined fleet from 2016 onward would be needed to reach the required level of 35 mpg by model year 2020.
For passenger cars, the proposal would increase fuel economy from the current 27.5 miles per gallon to an industry average of 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015. For light trucks, the proposal calls for increases from 23.5 miles per gallon in 2010 to an industry average of 28.6 miles per gallon in 2015. We estimate achieving these levels of fuel economy would require nearly $50 billion of investments in fuel saving technologies through 2015.
These standards are tough, but achievable and necessary. All told, the proposal will save nearly 55 billion gallons of fuel and a reduction in carbon dioxide emissions estimated at 521 million metric tons over the life of the affected vehicles.
To provide manufacturers with added flexibility, we have proposed regulations permitting them to transfer and trade compliance credits.
We will soon be receiving public comments on our proposal. Our decisions about the final rule will be reached after careful analysis of the comments and with the benefit of full analysis of the environmental impacts of the alternatives before the agency.
We expect to make a final decision this year, less than one year after the enactment of EISA. This will be an accomplishment in which we can all take credit and pride.
I would be pleased to answer any questions.
United States, Brazil Agree to Expanded Air Services
The United States and Brazil have concluded an agreement that will provide for a nearly 50 percent increase in passenger flights between the two countries as well as eliminate restrictions on the number of airlines that can provide U.S.-Brazil air service, U.S. Secretary of Transportation Mary E. Peters announced today.
“This agreement will help air carriers meet the growing demand for passenger and cargo services between the United States and Brazil,” said Secretary Peters. “Now more than ever, it is crucial that we give U.S. carriers every possible opportunity to compete and succeed wherever passengers want to fly.”
Any number of U.S. or Brazilian airlines now may fly between the two countries, removing the previous limit of four carriers from each side. The agreement also will, in four stages between July 2008 and October 2010, permit an increase in the number of weekly U.S.-Brazil passenger flights from 105 to 154 for each country’s carriers, Secretary Peters added.
The agreement also will allow expanded air cargo services between the United States and Brazil. The number of weekly cargo flights may expand from 24 to 35 immediately, and to 42 in the year 2010. In addition, the agreement allows cargo charter flights to increase from 750 per year to 1,000 immediately, and to 1,250 in 2010. U.S. cargo companies also will be allowed to transfer freight from aircraft to trucks for door-to-door delivery in Brazil.
Under the agreement, U.S. carriers may serve five new cities in Brazil – Fortaleza, Curitiba and three others to be selected by the United States. Currently, American Airlines, Continental Airlines, Delta Air Lines and United Airlines provide service between the United States and Sao Paolo and Rio de Janeiro. The agreement also allows, for the first time, U.S. and Brazilian carriers to provide certain types of service on a code-share basis with their partner airlines from third-countries.
The delegations agreed to apply the terms of the agreement on a reciprocal basis until it enters into force.
Statement of Mr. James F. Ports, Jr.
Deputy Administrator
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
before the
Subcommittee on Consumer Affairs, Insurance and Automotive Safety
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation
United States Senate
Oversight Hearing on Passenger Vehicle Roof Strength
June 4, 2008
Mr. Chairman, I am Jim Ports, Deputy Administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). I appreciate the opportunity to appear before the subcommittee to discuss the important issue of rollover protection, and particularly roof crush safety.
Every death and serious injury that occurs on our Nation’s highways is a tragedy. Rollover crashes account for about one-third of the nearly 30,000 light vehicle occupant fatalities that occur each year. I share the same feelings of concern and empathy as you for the individuals and families who have been tragically affected by these dreadful crashes, and extend my deepest condolences to them.
I am proud to say that NHTSA has taken significant steps to reduce the deaths and serious injuries that occur due to rollover crashes. Rollover crashes are complex and chaotic events. They can range from a single quarter turn to eight or more quarter turns, with the duration of the rollover crash lasting from one to several seconds. The wide range of rollover conditions occurs because these crashes largely occur off road where the vehicle motion is highly influenced by roadside conditions. Also, rollover crashes tend to occur at higher speeds than other crash types due to the energy required to initiate them.
The agency developed a comprehensive plan to address these crashes and has made great strides to implement these strategies. It is important to realize that each initiative in NHTSA’s comprehensive program addresses a different aspect of the rollover problem. Our strategy is to first reduce the occurrence of rollover crashes, secondly keep occupants inside the vehicle when rollovers do occur, and finally to better protect the occupants kept inside the vehicle during the rollover. Each of these three initiatives must work together to address the various aspects of the rollover problem.
The most effective way to reduce deaths and injuries in rollover crashes is to prevent the rollover crash from occurring. Two agency efforts have been taken to reduce the occurrence of rollover crashes -mandating that all passenger vehicles be equipped with Electronic Stability Control and incorporating a rollover rating into the agency’s 5-star vehicle safety ratings (known as the New Car Assessment Program).
In April 2007, NHTSA published a final rule establishing requirements for Electronic Stability Control, or ESC, in passenger cars, multipurpose passenger vehicles, trucks, and buses weighing less than 10,000 pounds. ESC systems use automatic computer-controlled braking of individual wheels to assist the driver in maintaining control in critical driving situations. ESC is the most significant safety advancement since the introduction of seat belts. The agency estimates that this technology will save up to 9,600 lives in all types of crashes annually once all light vehicles on the road are equipped with ESC. These safety benefits will occur in all types of crashes where the driver would lose control of the vehicle and the vehicle would crash off the road or into another vehicle. However, the lion’s share of these benefits will be in rollover crashes, where it is estimated that ESC systems will reduce about one-half (4,200 to 5,500) of the approximately 10,000 deaths each year resulting from rollover crashes.
NHTSA incorporated a rollover static stability factor into its New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) in 2001. This consumer information program uses market forces to encourage manufacturers to make safety improvements not the least of which has been the voluntary adoption of ESC systems in many vehicles, including sport utility vehicles. In the seven years since incorporation into NCAP, we estimate that the risk of rollover in a single vehicle crash for an average sport utility vehicle has been reduced by nearly 20 percent, and that an average pickup rollover risk has been reduced almost 10 percent.
When a rollover crash does occur, it is critical to keep the occupant inside the vehicle. The fatality rate for an ejected vehicle occupant is three times as great as that for an occupant who remains inside the vehicle. Our crash data show that about one-half of the people killed in vehicles that rolled over were completely ejected, and another 10 percent of those killed were partially ejected. So mitigating ejections offers potential for significant safety gains. Safety belts are the most effective crashworthiness countermeasure in reducing ejected rollover fatalities. In fact, seat belts reduce the probability of ejection by 91% in fatal crashes in passenger cars and light trucks. In addition to our successful efforts to increase seat belt use, NHTSA also has strength requirements for door latches and a forthcoming SAFETEA-LU proposal for ejection mitigation.
Finally, in addition to rollover crash prevention and ejection mitigation, we strive to better protect the occupants kept inside the vehicle during the rollover through enhanced roof crush resistance. In 1973, the United States became the first country to adopt a roof strength requirement. Since that time, Canada and Saudi Arabia have also adopted a similar requirement. No other government anywhere in the world has any requirement for roof strength.
Each initiative in NHTSA’s comprehensive program to address the different aspects of the rollover problem is important because each initiative has a different target population for which that initiative will be effective. Each of these three initiatives must work together to address the various aspects of the rollover problem. However, it is important to understand which portion of the rollover problem can be addressed by each of these three initiatives so that there is a clear and correct understanding of the safety benefits potentially associated with each of the different types of actions to reduce rollover deaths and injuries.
In August 2005, NHTSA published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to upgrade the roof crush requirements of light passenger vehicles. Among the major provisions, the NPRM proposed to extend application of the standard to heavier vehicles, increase the roof strength requirements so that a vehicle would sustain a load equal to 2.5 times its unloaded weight, and require a new headroom criterion. The agency has received a large number of comments from industry, public interest groups, and other parties addressing significant issues related to this proposed rule.
In response to extensive public interest and safety advocate comments on the NPRM, a Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (SNPRM) was published on January 30, 2008. The SNPRM modified our original proposal to include consideration of a two-sided test requirement, as well as soliciting comments to allow the agency the potential to go beyond a 2.5 Strength to Weight Ratio (SWR). Subsequent to issuance of the NPRM, the agency conducted extensive testing of current production vehicles to, among other things, determine the effects of two-sided testing and to assess the roof strengths of vehicles currently on the market. These test results were released in the SNPRM.
Since issuance of the NPRM in 2005, NHTSA has collected and analyzed additional crash data, tested the strength of vehicle roofs in the vehicle fleet, completed cost and lead-time studies, and completed other analyses important for the final rule development. The agency is in the final stages of its work to issue the final rule. Because we are still in rulemaking on this Standard, we are not able to discuss specific decisions related to estimates of lives saved, stringency of the requirements, or other issues related to the final rule.
Mr. Chairman, thank you for your consideration and this subcommittee’s ongoing efforts to improve highway safety. I would be pleased to answer any questions.
Transportation Secretary Mary Peters Launches DOT’s Blog
Welcome to the Fast Lane!
U.S. Transportation Secretary Mary E. Peters today launched Fast Lane, the Department’s new blog. Accessible at http://fastlane.dot.gov, Fast Lane will be an on-line community for all those interested in the nation’s transportation system and its future.
Fast Lane contributors will include Secretary Peters, Deputy Secretary Thomas Barrett, Administrators from the Department’s operating agencies, and other senior officials. In addition, the site will welcome guest bloggers from government, industry, and the transportation community. The Department will also use the blog to break news and make announcements.
“Fast Lane will allow me and others here at the Department to speak directly with interested citizens, members of the transportation community and the blogosphere to engage in an earnest conversation about our nation’s transportation future,” Secretary Peters said. “I have made 21st century solutions a priority for our transportation system, and now I’m thrilled to be using a 21st century communications tool to reach Americans in a whole new way.”
Fast Lane is an open forum, and visitors are encouraged to submit comments, contribute ideas, and bring to the Department’s attention innovative and exciting transportation activities in their communities. All comments will be reviewed before inclusion, and a representative sample will be posted to the site.
BTS Releases Fourth-Quarter 2007 Air Fare Data;
Average Fourth-Quarter Air Fares Rose 4.0 Percent from 2006
Average air fares in the fourth quarter of 2007 were up 4.0 percent from the fourth quarter of 2006, reaching the highest fourth-quarter level since 2001 but remaining 2.7 percent below the high set in 2000 for any October-to-December period, the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), a part of the Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA), reported today.
A press release containing information about fourth-quarter average fares and the Air Travel Price Index, a quarterly measure of changes in airfares is available at www.dot.gov/affairs/briefing.htm. Additional information about air fares in the fourth quarter, including average fares for the top 100 airports, and about ATPI, including indexes for foreign-origin itineraries and the top 85 air travel markets based on originating passengers, can be found on the BTS website, http://www.bts.gov/xml/atpi/src/index.xml.
Multiple airport areas for which a single average fare calculation is available are: Boston, Chicago, Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston, Los Angeles, New York, San Francisco and Washington, DC.
Airports covered by average fare calculations are:
| Alabama. | Birmingham | ||
| Alaska: | Anchorage | ||
| Arizona | Phoenix, Tucson | ||
| Arkansas: | Little Rock | ||
| California: | Burbank, Long Beach, Los Angeles Intl, Oakland, | ||
| Ontario/San Bernardino, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, San Jose, Santa Ana (Orange County) | |||
| Colorado | Colorado Springs, Denver | ||
| Connecticut | Hartford | ||
| District of Columbia | Dulles, Reagan National | ||
| Florida | Ft. Lauderdale, Ft. Myers, Jacksonville, Miami, Orlando, Pensacola, | ||
| Tampa, West Palm Beach | |||
| Georgia | Atlanta | ||
| Hawaii | Honolulu, Hilo, Kahului (Maui), Kona, Lihue (Kauai) | ||
| Idaho | Boise | ||
| Illinois | Chicago Midway, Chicago O'Hare | ||
| Indiana | Indianapolis | ||
| Iowa | Des Moines | ||
| Kansas | Wichita | ||
| Kentucky | Louisville | ||
| Louisiana | New Orleans | ||
| Maine | Portland | ||
| Maryland | Baltimore | ||
| Massachusetts | Boston | ||
| Michigan | Detroit, Grand Rapids, Flint | ||
| Minnesota | Minneapolis/St. Paul | ||
| Mississippi | Jackson/Vicksburg | ||
| Missouri | Kansas City, St. Louis | ||
| Nebraska | Omaha | ||
| Nevada | Las Vegas, Reno | ||
| New Hampshire | Manchester | ||
| New Jersey | Newark | ||
| New Mexico | Albuquerque | ||
| New York | Albany, Buffalo, Islip, New York JFK, New York LaGuardia, Rochester, Syracuse, White Plains | ||
| North Carolina | Charlotte, Greensboro, Raleigh/Durham | ||
| Ohio | Akron/Canton, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus, Dayton | ||
| Oklahoma | Oklahoma City, Tulsa | ||
| Oregon | Portland | ||
| Pennsylvania | Harrisburg, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh | ||
| Rhode Island | Providence | ||
| South Carolina | Charleston | ||
| Tennessee | Knoxville, Memphis, Nashville | ||
| Texas | Austin, Dallas Love, Dallas/Ft. Worth, El Paso, Houston Bush, Houston Hobby, San Antonio | ||
| Utah | Salt Lake City | ||
| Vermont | Burlington | ||
| Virginia | Norfolk, Richmond | ||
| Washington | Seattle, Spokane | ||
| Wisconsin | Madison, Milwaukee | ||
| Puerto Rico | San Juan |
CAFE STANDARDS ANNOUNCEMENT
WASHINGTON, DC
APRIL 22, 2008
1:00 PM
Good afternoon, and thank you all for being here today.
The summer driving season is nearly here, and families everywhere are
thinking about their vacation plans. Unfortunately, the high gas prices are
causing some to cancel campsite reservations or re-evaluate that family road
trip.
One of President Bush’s goals is to reduce our dependence on foreign sources
of oil. One way we can meet this goal is to reduce the amount of gas our
cars use.
I arrived here today in a hybrid vehicle – a Saturn Aura that is regularly
used in our fleet of vehicles at DOT, which also includes flex-fuel SUVs
used by my security team. These are just some of the amazing fuel-saving
technologies that are now readily available.
I just spent some time looking at the group of fuel-efficient cars behind
me. All of them incorporate the latest and greatest technological
breakthroughs in fuel efficiency — easing the strain on both consumer
wallets and our nation’s fuel consumption.
Today, I am announcing new proposed fuel standards that are historically
ambitious, yet achievable.
Under the proposed rule, the fuel economy on a fleet-wide basis will
increase by an average of four-and-a-half percent annually through 2015 – a
25 percent improvement over five years. This standard exceeds the 3.3
percent average annual increase needed to reach the target passed by
Congress last year.
For passenger cars, this means increasing fuel economy from the current 27.5
miles per gallon standard to an industry average of 35.7 miles per gallon by
2015.
For light trucks, the proposal calls for increases from 23.5 miles per
gallon in 2010 to 28.6 miles per gallon in 2015.
All told, this proposal will save nearly 55 billion gallons of fuel over the
lifetime of the vehicles affected, which is those in model years 2011
through 2015. And it will save America’s drivers over $100 billion in fuel
costs over the lifetime of those vehicles.
Over the last six years, this Administration has twice made changes to our
nation’s Corporate Average Fuel Economy, or CAFE, standards by increasing
mileage requirements for light trucks.
Last year, President Bush called for an energy plan that goes even further
by requiring attribute-based fuel efficiency standards for passenger
vehicles. His plan, called the “Twenty-in-Ten” initiative, was passed by
Congress last year.
Our proposal ensures that we can accomplish these significant gains in fuel
economy by basing standards on vehicle attributes, such as size. An
attribute-based approach allows us to reduce fuel consumption without
sacrificing safety. We will not compromise safety in pursuit of increased
fuel efficiency. And, with this rule, we do not have to.
As some of you may know, today is Earth Day. It is nice to be out here under
the trees today – they serve as a reminder of the much larger world that
exists outside of concrete jungles like Washington, and as a reminder to
breathe every once in awhile.
This proposal will also help us all breathe a little easier by reducing
carbon dioxide emissions from tailpipes, cutting fuel consumption and making
driving a little more affordable.
In fact, the standards in this proposal would reduce carbon dioxide
emissions by an estimated 521 million metric tons, and is an important part
of this Administration’s commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Finally, as required by Congress, the proposal allows for automakers to earn
credits for exceeding CAFE standards. This will serve as an incentive for
companies to exceed these goals while giving manufacturers flexibility to
meet the standards without compromising their economic vitality.
Our goal is to save fuel, not endanger jobs. These credits allow us to do
just that.
As the vehicles behind me show, technology is making our cars as fuel
efficient as possible while maintaining safety. Our approach ensures that
consumers can enjoy the freedom to purchase the cars they want while
requiring all manufacturers to do more.
Looking at these vehicles, it is easy to see a not-too-distant future when
cars fueled by something other than gasoline will be readily available and
affordable. Until that time, however, we will continue to do what we can,
safely and efficiently, to improve gas mileage and help consumers spend less
time – and less money – at the pump.
Secretary Peters Proposes 25 Percent Increase in Fuel Efficiency
Standards Over 5 Years for Passenger Vehicles, Light Trucks
Fuel efficiency standards for both passenger vehicles and light trucks would
increase by 4.5 percent per year over the five-year period ending in 2015 –
a 25 percent total improvement that exceeds the 3.3 percent baseline
proposed by Congress last year – under an ambitious new proposal announced
today by U.S. Transportation Secretary Mary E. Peters.
“This proposal is historically ambitious, yet achievable,” Secretary Peters
said. “It will help us all breathe a little easier by reducing tailpipe
emissions, cutting fuel consumption and making driving a little more
affordable.”
For passenger cars, the proposal would increase fuel economy from the
current 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015. For light
trucks, the proposal calls for increases from 23.5 miles per gallon in 2010
to 28.6 miles per gallon in 2015.
All told, the proposal will save nearly 55 billion gallons of fuel and a
reduction in carbon dioxide emissions estimated at 521 million metric tons.
The plan will save America’s drivers over $100 billion in fuel costs over
the lifetime of the vehicles covered by the rule, Secretary Peters said.
As required by Congress, the proposed rule allows for automakers to earn
credits for exceeding Corporate Average Fuel Economy, or CAFE, standards.
This will serve as an incentive for companies to exceed these goals while
giving manufacturers flexibility to meet the standards without compromising
their economic vitality. The goal is to save fuel, not endanger jobs,
Secretary Peters said.
“Looking at the fuel-efficient technologies already available, it’s easy to
see a not-too-distant future when cars fueled by something other than
gasoline will be readily available and affordable,” Secretary Peters said.
“Until that time, however, we will continue to do what we can, safely and
efficiently, to improve gas mileage and help consumers spend less time and
less money at the pump.”
Over the last six years, the Administration has twice made changes to the
nation’s CAFE standards, including the first since 1975 to increase mileage
requirements for light trucks. Last year, President Bush called for an
energy plan that goes even further by requiring attribute-based fuel
efficiency standards for passenger vehicles. A copy of the CAFE proposal can
be found at
www.nhtsa.gov.
DOT 54-08
Contact: Brian Turmail
Friday, April 18, 2008
Tel.: (202) 366-4570
U.S. Secretary of Transportation Mary E. Peters Announces Steps to
Improve Aviation Safety Inspection Program, and Minimize Air Travel
Disruptions
Names Independent Study Team to Recommend Improvements to FAA Safety
Culture, Implementation of Safety Program
U.S. Secretary of Transportation Mary E. Peters today announced a series
of measures to improve the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) safety
inspection program, and minimize travel disruptions caused when airlines
abruptly ground aircraft. The Secretary also tasked a newly created
independent review team with crafting recommendations to improve the current
aviation safety system.
“The mark of an effective safety system is the ability to constantly improve
and adapt,” said Secretary Peters. “These steps will help make inspectors
and managers more accountable, keep airlines focused on safety and minimize
disruptions for travelers.”
The Secretary said the FAA would begin implementing a new program to track the inspections being conducted by field offices that will alert key personnel whenever a safety inspection is overdue. She added that the agency would begin requiring senior level officials within the agency’s field offices to be accountable for accepting voluntary safety disclosures from airlines and to revise ethics rules to require a cooling-off period before FAA inspectors can work for an airline they used to oversee or interact while at the agency.
In addition, she announced that the FAA is establishing a new National Safety Inspection Review team. This new team will be deployed to air carriers to conduct focused and comprehensive safety reviews. She added that the team’s deployments would be based on where the safety data indicates problems are most likely to occur.
The Secretary said she was asking both the FAA and American Airlines for assessments, within 14 days, of what happened, why it happened and what could have been done differently. She added that “their reports will go a long way in explaining why so many aircraft had to be grounded and so many travelers had to be inconvenienced.”
Secretary Peters also announced that she has tasked the Department’s
Office of Aviation Safety Enforcement in the Office of General Counsel to
gauge whether airlines have adequate plans in place to accommodate
passengers should a carrier have to abruptly ground its aircraft.
Saying that “we must do more, though, than respond to the lessons of the
past few weeks,” the Secretary announced that she has created an outside
team of aviation and safety experts to evaluate and craft recommendations to
improve the FAA’s implementation of the aviation safety system and its
culture of safety.
The Secretary said the FAA’s current approach to safety oversight was both sound and delivering decisive results. She added though that the last few weeks had made it clear that “a good system can always be made better.” So she has tasked the team with developing recommendations within 120 days on how the agency can do an even better job safeguarding the skies.
The members of the outside team are:
* J. Randall Babbitt served as the President and CEO of the Air Line Pilots Association and has been active with the organization since 1981. His current position is Chairman & CEO of Eclat Consulting, a consulting firm providing specialized aviation and labor consulting services.
* William O. McCabe served as former Director of Aviation DuPont and Member of Board of Governors at the Flight Safety Foundation. He has chaired the Aerospace Industries Association of America’s Civil Aviation Council and is a member of the AIA Board of Governors. He also is on the Safety Committee of the National Business Aviation Association and serves on the Board of Directors of the Delaware Aerospace Education Foundation.
* Malcolm K. Sparrow is Professor of the Practice of Public Management at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government and Faculty Chair of the Executive Program on Strategic Management of Regulatory and Enforcement Agencies. He served 10 years with the British Police Service, rising to the rank of Detective Chief Inspector.
* Ambassador Edward W. Stimpson was appointed by President Clinton in July 1999 as the Representative of the United States of America on the Council of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). For 25 years, Mr. Stimpson was President of the General Aviation Manufacturers Association (GAMA), representing more than 50 companies involved in the manufacture of aircraft and component parts.
* Hon. Carl W. Vogt was appointed by President Bush in 1992 as a Member and as Chairman of the National Transportation Safety Board. In 1996, FAA Administrator David Hinson appointed Mr. Vogt as a member of the FAA Ninety Day Safety Review Committee. Also in 1996, Mr. Vogt was appointed by President Clinton as a member of the White House Commission on Aviation Safety and Security.
“Taken together, these new measures will improve aviation safety, answer tough questions and put travelers at ease,” said Secretary Peters. “They will build on the historic accomplishments of this agency and the record commitment to safety that everyone involved in commercial aviation in this country shares.”
###
U.S. Department of Transportation
Office of Public Affairs
Washington, D.C.
www.dot.gov/affairs/briefing.htm
Speech
REMARKS FOR
THE HONORABLE MARY PETERS
SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION
FAA SAFETY ANNOUCEMENT
WASHINGTON, D.C.
APRIL 18, 2008
2 PM
Good afternoon. Thank you all for coming, and thank you, Bobby, for that
introduction and for your strong leadership and fierce dedication to the
safety of our aviation system.
Acting Administrator Sturgell and I just met with the senior leadership of the Federal Aviation Administration. We talked about how by virtually every measure flying today is safer than it has ever been.
The men and women of this agency share much of the credit for the significant improvement in aviation safety this country has experienced over the last decade. Thanks to their hard work, we have the most sophisticated and fundamentally sound approach to aviation safety of any country in the world.
We also talked about the doubts that have been raised because of the unacceptable actions of a few. And we all expressed our concern and sympathy for the frustrations and inconveniences that too many travelers have experienced over the past few weeks.
The mark of an effective safety system is the ability to constantly improve and adapt. The people of this agency understand that well and have crafted an approach to aviation safety that is constantly evolving and ever improving.
Today we are announcing new measures designed to improve upon an already impressive safety system. These steps will help make inspectors and managers even more accountable, keep airlines focused on safety, and minimize disruptions for travelers.
The FAA will begin implementing a new program to track the inspections
being conducted by its field offices. This program is designed to alert
local, regional and D.C.-based FAA personnel when an inspection is overdue.
In addition, the FAA is establishing a new national safety inspection review
team. Its job will be to place extra focus on the areas of the system where
the data tells us problems are most likely to occur.
And I have asked Bobby to make sure that higher-level FAA officials are held accountable for accepting the voluntary disclosures from airlines of safety or maintenance issues. So we are going to have senior officials within our field offices sign off on voluntary disclosures in addition to local inspectors.
These measures follow an earlier decision by Bobby and his team to require senior airline officials to sign off on safety disclosure reports and to revise ethics rules to require a cooling-off period before FAA inspectors can work for an airline they used to oversee or can interact with the agency.
We want to make it clear that there is no place in this agency for anyone interested in turning a blind eye to the safety of our skies. And we also will get to the bottom of why it was that hundreds of thousands of travelers had vacations cancelled and business trips interrupted last week.
All of us have an obligation to the travelers who were inconvenienced to see what lessons can be applied from these recent experiences that would minimize future disruptions for travelers.
So today I am asking the FAA and American Airlines to provide me, within 14 days, their assessments of what happened, why it happened, and what, if anything, could have been done differently.
Their reports will go a long way in explaining why so many aircraft had to be grounded and so many travelers had to be inconvenienced. More importantly, their answers should help us avoid similar disruptions as the FAA completes its comprehensive audit.
In addition, I have asked our Office of Aviation Enforcement to gauge whether the airlines have adequate plans in place to address the needs of passengers should another carrier have to abruptly ground its aircraft. Travelers should not pay the price for unmet deadlines or unclear instructions.
We must do more, though, than respond to the lessons of the past few weeks. As safety professionals, we have to ask what else can be done to improve our approach to safety.
<